We initiate the work on maximin share (MMS) fair allocation of m indivisible chores to n agents using only their ordinal preferences, from both algorithmic and mechanism design perspectives. The previous best-known approximation is 2-1/n by Aziz et al. [IJCAI 2017]. We improve this result by giving a simple deterministic 5/3-approximation algorithm that determines an allocation sequence of agents, according to which items are allocated one by one. By a tighter analysis, we show that for n=2,3, our algorithm achieves better approximation ratios, and is actually optimal. We also consider the setting with strategic agents, where agents may misreport their preferences to manipulate the outcome. We first provide a O(\log (m/n))-approximation consecutive picking algorithm, and then improve the approximation ratio to O(\sqrt{\log n}) by a randomized algorithm. Our results uncover some interesting contrasts between the approximation ratios achieved for chores versus goods.
Chore division is the problem of fairly dividing some divisible, undesirable bad, such as a set of chores, among a number of players. Each player has their own valuation of the chores, and must be satisfied they did not receive more than their fair share. In this paper, I consider the problem of strategyproof chore division, in which the algorithm must ensure that each player cannot benefit from mis-representing their position. I present an algorithm that performs proportional and strategyproof chore division for any number of players given piecewise uniform valuation functions.
We initiate the work on fair and strategyproof allocation of indivisible chores. The fairness concept we consider in this paper is maxmin share (MMS) fairness. We consider three previously studied models of information elicited from the agents: the ordinal model, the cardinal model, and the public ranking model in which the ordinal preferences are publicly known. We present both positive and negative results on the level of MMS approximation that can be guaranteed if we require the algorithm to be strategyproof. Our results uncover some interesting contrasts between the approximation ratios ac…
In this paper, we consider the problem of how to fairly dividing $m$ indivisible chores among $n$ agents. The fairness measure we considered here is the maximin share. The previous best known result is that there always exists a $\frac{4}{3}$ approximation maximin share allocation. With a novel algorithm, we can always find a $\frac{11}{9}$ approximation maximin share allocation for any instances. We also discuss how to improve the efficiency of the algorithm and its connection to the job scheduling problem.
We study the problem of fairly allocating a set of m indivisible chores (items with non-positive value) to n agents. We consider the desirable fairness notion of 1-out-of-d maximin share (MMS) -- the minimum value that an agent can guarantee by partitioning items into d bundles and receiving the least valued bundle -- and focus on ordinal approximation of MMS that aims at finding the largest d <= n for which 1-out-of-d MMS allocation exists. Our main contribution is a polynomial-time algorithm for 1-out-of-floor(2n/3) MMS allocation, and a proof of existence of 1-out-of-floor(3n/4) MMS allocat…
We study several fairness notions in allocating indivisible chores (i.e., items with non-positive values) to agents who have additive and submodular cost functions. The fairness criteria we are concern with are envy-free up to any item (EFX), envy-free up to one item (EF1), maximin share (MMS), and pairwise maximin share (PMMS), which are proposed as relaxations of envy-freeness in the setting of additive cost functions. For allocations under each fairness criterion, we establish their approximation guarantee for other fairness criteria. Under the additive setting, our results show strong conn…
We consider the problem of allocating indivisible goods to agents with additive valuation functions. Kurokawa, Procaccia and Wang {[JACM, 2018]} present instances for which every allocation gives some agent less than her maximin share. We present such examples with larger gaps. For three agents and nine items, we design an instance in which at least one agent does not get more than a $\frac{39}{40}$ fraction of her maximin share. {Moreover, we show that there is no negative example in which the difference between the number of items and the number of agents is smaller than six, and that the ga…
We consider the problem of approximate maximin share (MMS) allocation of indivisible items among three agents with additive valuation functions. For goods, we show that an $\frac{11}{12}$ - MMS allocation always exists, improving over the previously known bound of $\frac{8}{9}$ . Moreover, in our allocation, we can prespecify an agent that is to receive her full proportional share (PS); we also present examples showing that for such allocations the ratio of $\frac{11}{12}$ is best possible. For chores, we show that a $\frac{19}{18}$-MMS allocation always exists. Also in this case, we can presp…
A major open question in fair allocation of indivisible items is whether there always exists an allocation of chores that is Pareto optimal (PO) and envy-free up to one item (EF1). We answer this question affirmatively for the natural class of bivalued utilities, where each agent partitions the chores into easy and difficult ones, and has cost $p > 1$ for chores that are difficult for her and cost $1$ for chores that are easy for her. Such an allocation can be found in polynomial time using an algorithm based on the Fisher market. We also show that for a slightly broader class of utilities, wh…
Non-Existence of PMMS Allocations and a $4/3$-PMMS Guarantee for Additive Chores
Nanyang Technological University（南洋理工大学）；University of Macau（澳门大学）；Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen（哈尔滨工业大学（深圳））；Shanghai Jiao Tong University（上海交通大学）
We study the problem of allocating indivisible chores to agents under the Maximin share (MMS) fairness notion. The chores are embedded on a graph and each bundle of chores assigned to an agent should be connected. Although there is a simple algorithm for MMS allocations of goods on trees, it remains open whether MMS allocations of chores on trees always exist or not, which is a simple but annoying problem in chores allocation. In this paper, we introduce a new method for chores allocation with connectivity constraints, called the group-satisfied method, that can show the existence of MMS alloc…
We study fair allocation of indivisible goods and chores among agents with \emph{lexicographic} preferences -- a subclass of additive valuations. In sharp contrast to the goods-only setting, we show that an allocation satisfying \emph{envy-freeness up to any item} (EFX) could fail to exist for a mixture of \emph{objective} goods and chores. To our knowledge, this negative result provides the \emph{first} counterexample for EFX over (any subdomain of) additive valuations. To complement this non-existence result, we identify a class of instances with (possibly subjective) mixed items where an EF…
In this paper, we study how to fairly allocate m indivisible chores to n (asymmetric) agents. We consider (weighted) proportionality up to any item (PROPX) and show that a (weighted) PROPX allocation always exists and can be computed efficiently. For chores, we argue that PROPX might be a more reliable relaxation for proportionality by the facts that any PROPX allocation ensures 2-approximation of maximin share (MMS) fairness [Budish, 2011] for symmetric agents and of anyprice share (APS) fairness [Babaioff et al, 2021] for asymmetric agents. APS allocations for chores have not been studied be…
We study the problem of fairly allocating a set of indivisible items to a set of agents with additive valuations. Recently, Feige et al. (WINE'21) proved that a maximin share (MMS) allocation exists for all instances with $n$ agents and no more than $n + 5$ items. Moreover, they proved that an MMS allocation is not guaranteed to exist for instances with $3$ agents and at least $9$ items, or $n \ge 4$ agents and at least $3n + 3$ items. In this work, we shrink the gap between these upper and lower bounds for guaranteed existence of MMS allocations. We prove that for any integer $c > 0$, there e…
We consider the problem of allocating $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with additive disvaluation (cost) functions. It is easy to show that there are picking sequences that give every agent (that uses the greedy picking strategy) a bundle of chores of disvalue at most twice her share value (maximin share, MMS, for agents of equal entitlement, and anyprice share, APS, for agents of arbitrary entitlement). Aziz, Li and Wu (2022) designed picking sequences that improve this ratio to $\frac{5}{3}$ for the case of equal entitlement. We design picking sequences that improve the ratio to~1.733 fo…
We study the problem of fair allocation of a set of indivisible items among agents with additive valuations, under cardinality constraints. In this setting, the items are partitioned into categories, each with its own limit on the number of items it may contribute to any bundle. We consider the fairness measure known as the maximin share (MMS) guarantee, and propose a novel polynomial-time algorithm for finding $1/2$-approximate MMS allocations for goods -- an improvement from the previously best available guarantee of $11/30$. For single-category instances, we show that a modified variant of …
It is often beneficial for agents to pool their resources in order to better accommodate fluctuations in individual demand. Many multi-round resource allocation mechanisms operate in an online manner: in each round, the agents specify their demands for that round, and the mechanism determines a corresponding allocation. In this paper, we focus instead on the offline setting in which the agents specify their demand for each round at the outset. We formulate a specific resource allocation problem in this setting, and design and analyze an associated mechanism based on the solution concept of lex…
Comparison-Based Fair Division of Indivisible Chores
University of Macau（澳门大学）；Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen（哈尔滨工业大学（深圳））；Shanghai Jiao Tong University（上海交通大学）；Nanyang Technological University（南洋理工大学）
Most of the existing algorithms for fair division do not consider externalities. Under externalities, the utility an agent obtains depends not only on its allocation but also on the allocation of other agents. An agent has a positive (negative) value for the assigned goods (chores). This work focuses on a special case of externality, i.e., an agent receives positive or negative value for unassigned items independent of which other agent gets it. We show that it is possible to adapt existing algorithms using a transformation to ensure certain fairness and efficiency notions in this setting. Des…
Envy-freeness up to any good (EFX) provides a strong and intuitive guarantee of fairness in the allocation of indivisible goods. But whether such allocations always exist or whether they can be efficiently computed remains an important open question. We study the existence and computation of EFX in conjunction with various other economic properties under lexicographic preferences--a well-studied preference model in artificial intelligence and economics. In sharp contrast to the known results for additive valuations, we not only prove the existence of EFX and Pareto optimal allocations, but in …
In this work, we revisit the problem of fairly allocating a number of indivisible items that are located on a line to multiple agents. A feasible allocation requires that the allocated items to each agent are connected on the line. The items can be goods on which agents have non-negative utilities, or chores on which the utilities are non-positive. Our objective is to understand the extent to which welfare is inevitably sacrificed by enforcing the allocations to be fair, i.e., price of fairness (PoF). We study both egalitarian and utilitarian welfare. Previous works by Suksompong [Discret. App…
In this paper we initiate the study of finding fair and efficient allocations of an indivisible mixed manna: Divide m indivisible items among n agents under the fairness notion of maximin share (MMS) and the efficiency notion of Pareto optimality (PO). A mixed manna allows an item to be a good for some agents and a chore for others. The problem of finding $α$-MMS allocation for the (near) best $α\in(0,1]$ for which it exists, remains unresolved even for a goods manna with constantly many agents, while the problem of finding $α$-MMS+PO allocation is unexplored for any $α\in(0,1]$. We make signi…
