arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~

不可分割混合甘露的时间公平分配:易处理设置

Temporal Fair Division of Indivisible Mixed Manna: Tractable Settings

Kui-Wang Choi, Minming Li, Nicholas Teh

arXiv 2608.20033首次发表:更新:

AI 中文总结

本文研究不可分割混合甘露的时间公平分配问题,确定了多个易处理设置,给出了对应规则或算法,同时证明了部分相关问题的NP难性。

AI 中文摘要

我们研究不可分割混合甘露的时间公平分配问题。物品随时间到达且必须不可撤销地分配;一件物品对部分智能体而言是益品,对另一些智能体而言是负担,对其余智能体而言是中性物品。我们要求每一轮后的累计分配满足无嫉妒至多一件物品(TEF1)。尽管判定TEF1分配是否存在即使对于益品也是NP难问题,但我们确定了几个易处理设置。首先,对于至多k种物品类型,在线循环规则在每一件物品到达后保证EF⌈k/2⌉,因此每一个至多两种类型的实例都允许在线TEF1分配;此外,当智能体数量和类型数量固定时,TEF1的存在性可在多项式时间内判定。其次,在智能体特定缩放后的一致性条件下,若缩放因子在物品到达前已知,在线规则会在每一件物品到达后生成满足EF1且帕累托最优的分配。第三,对于具有共同排序的两部分到达序列,我们给出的规则在每一件物品到达后满足EF1。第四,当智能体数量固定且价值为有界整数时,我们给出判定TEF1存在性的精确伪多项式算法。最后,对于益品,每一个TEF1分配在每一轮后为每个智能体提供至少其最大最小份额的1/n;该因子即使对于相同价值和两轮也是紧的。判定精确时间最大最小份额分配是否存在对于益品和负担都是NP难问题,即使在价值相同、两个智能体和两轮的情况下也是如此。

英文摘要

We study temporal fair division of indivisible mixed manna. Items arrive over time and must be allocated irrevocably; an item may be a good for some agents, a chore for others, and neutral for the rest. We require the cumulative allocation after every round to be envy-free up to one item (TEF1). Although deciding whether a TEF1 allocation exists is NP-hard even for goods, we identify several tractable settings. First, with at most $k$ item types, an online cyclic rule guarantees EF$\lceil k/2\rceil$ after every item arrival. Thus, every instance with at most two types admits an online TEF1 allocation; moreover, when the numbers of agents and types are fixed, TEF1 existence can be decided in polynomial time. Second, under agreement after agent-specific scaling, provided that the scaling factors are known before arrivals begin, an online rule produces an allocation that is EF1 and Pareto optimal after every item arrival. Third, for a two-part arrival sequence with common rankings, we give a rule that is EF1 after every item arrival. Fourth, when the number of agents is fixed and values are bounded integers, we give an exact pseudo-polynomial algorithm for deciding TEF1 existence. Finally, for goods, every TEF1 allocation gives each agent at least $1/n$ of her maximin share after every round; this factor is tight even for identical valuations and two rounds. Deciding whether an exact temporal maximin-share allocation exists is NP-hard for both goods and chores, even with identical valuations, two agents, and two rounds.

论文原文

arXiv 摘要页 · PDF 原文 · HTML 原文

↑