arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1702.04537cs.HCcs.CYcs.SI
收藏

人与机器的互动

The Interplay between Human and Machine Agency

J. Brian Pickering, Vegard Engen, Paul Walland

摘要:

人机网络影响着我们生活的许多方面:从与家人和朋友分享经验,知识创造和远程学习,管理水电费或提供零售商品的反馈,到更专业的网络,为人类操作员提供决策支持,并通过临床医生,家人,朋友以及物理和虚拟社交机器人网络提供医疗保健。这种网络依赖于日益复杂的机器算法,例如,推荐朋友或购买商品,跟踪我们的在线活动以优化可用服务,并评估风险以帮助维护甚至增强人们的健康。通过这些网络,机器为用户提供了越来越多的权力和范围,这些机器必须支持并允许用户能够实现诸如保持联系、做出更好的决策和监测他们的健康等目标。因此,这归结为人类和机器机构之间的协同作用,其中一个以复杂的方式依赖于另一个。随着代理问题的出现,信任,风险和监管,以及社会影响和潜在的计算机介导的自我效能。在本文中,我们探讨这些结构和它们之间的关系,并提出了一个模型的基础上审查的文献,旨在确定它们之间的各种依赖关系。

英文摘要:

Human-machine networks affect many aspects of our lives: from sharing experiences with family and friends, knowledge creation and distance learning, and managing utility bills or providing feedback on retail items, to more specialised networks providing decision support to human operators and the delivery of health care via a network of clinicians, family, friends, and both physical and virtual social robots. Such networks rely on increasingly sophisticated machine algorithms, e.g., to recommend friends or purchases, to track our online activities in order to optimise the services available, and assessing risk to help maintain or even enhance people's health. Users are being offered ever increasing power and reach through these networks by machines which have to support and allow users to be able to achieve goals such as maintaining contact, making better decisions, and monitoring their health. As such, this comes down to a synergy between human and machine agency in which one is dependent in complex ways on the other. With that agency questions arise about trust, risk and regulation, as well as social influence and potential for computer-mediated self-efficacy. In this paper, we explore these constructs and their relationships and present a model based on review of the literature which seeks to identify the various dependencies between them.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑