arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv quant-ph/0202064quant-ph
收藏

重新审视地方和现实

Locality and reality revisited

Adrian Kent

摘要:

贝尔给出了局部隐变量理论的标准定义,并证明了这种理论在不违反他的“自由意志”准则的情况下无法重现量子力学的预言:实验者的测量选择可以被假设为与测量之前被测系统的性质无关。这里考虑另一种选择:量子力学基础的隐变量概率理论可以是统计局部的,在这个意义上,它提供了由只涉及局部项的表达式定义的全局配置概率。这使得贝尔相关性不依赖于{ \it要么}一种阴谋论,其中先前的共同原因将系统状态与实验者的选择相关联{ \it或}一种反向因果关系原理,其中实验者的选择影响早期的系统状态。特别是,没有违反自由意志标准。它给出了一个不同的角度对贝尔相关性,其中的难题不是,显然非本地的相关性应该出现的规则涉及本地量,而是我们没有看到更普遍的非本地的相关性,允许悖论免疫形式的超光速信号。

英文摘要:

Bell gave the now standard definition of a local hidden variable theory and showed that such theories cannot reproduce the predictions of quantum mechanics without violating his ``free will'' criterion: experimenters' measurement choices can be assumed to be uncorrelated with properties of the measured system prior to measurement. An alternative is considered here: a probabilistic theory of hidden variables underlying quantum mechanics could be statistically local, in the sense that it supplies global configuration probabilities which are defined by expressions involving only local terms. This allows Bell correlations without relying on {\it either} a conspiracy theory in which prior common causes correlate the system state with experimenters' choices {\it or} a reverse causation principle in which experimenters' choices affect the earlier system states. In particular, there is no violation of the free will criterion. It gives a different perspective on Bell correlations, in which the puzzle is not that apparently non-local correlations should emerge from rules involving local quantities, but rather that we do not see more general non-local correlations that allow paradox-immune forms of superluminal signalling.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑