arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2201.09304math.NTmath.AG

关于A-动机上同调的整数部分

On the Integral Part of A-Motivic Cohomology

CMLS, École Polytechnique(综合数理学院,巴黎高等师范学院)

Quentin Gazda

AI总结:

本文研究了正特征全局域上的A-动机上同调的整数部分,提出模型版本和l-adic版本的定义,并证明模型版本包含l-adic版本,同时探讨了regulated extensions的子模块。

摘要:

附着于定义在数域F上的代数簇的最深层算术不变量被认为由其动机上同调的整数部分所捕捉。当X是光滑项目ive簇时,定义该整数部分主要有两种方式:一种是通过正则模型的K-理论,另一种是通过其l-adic实现。两种方法被推测一致。本文开始研究全局正特征域上的动机上同调,即A-动机上同调,其中经典混合动机被替换为混合Anderson A-动机。我们的主要目标是通过Gardeyn提出的A-动机最大模型的概念来定义A-动机上同调的整数部分的模型版本和l-adic版本。我们的主要结果指出模型版本包含l-adic版本。与数域设定预期不同,我们证明在一般情况下两种方法不一致。本文最后引入混合Anderson A-动机的regulated extensions子模块,我们预期两种方法在此情况下一致,并解决了一些特定情况的期望。

英文摘要:

The deepest arithmetic invariants attached to an algebraic variety defined over a number field $F$ are conjecturally captured by the integral part of its motivic cohomology. There are essentially two ways of defining it when $X$ is a smooth projective variety: one is via the $K$-theory of a regular model, the other is through its $\ell$-adic realization. Both approaches are conjectured to coincide. This paper initiates the study of motivic cohomology for global fields of positive characteristic, hereafter named $A$-motivic cohomology, where classical mixed motives are replaced by mixed Anderson $A$-motives. Our main objective is to set the definitions of the model version and the $\ell$-adic version of the integral part of $A$-motivic cohomology, using Gardeyn's notion of maximal models of $A$-motives as the analogue of regular models of varieties. Our main result states that the model version is contained in the $\ell$-adic version. As opposed to what is expected in the number field setting, we show that the two approaches do not match in general. We conclude this work by introducing the submodule of regulated extensions of mixed Anderson $A$-motives, for which we expect the two approaches to match, and solve some particular cases of this expectation.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑