arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2102.03205hep-thmath-phmath.MP
收藏

沼泽地几何与规范耦合

Swampland geometry and the gauge couplings

Sergio Cecotti

AI总结:

本文用新提出的“内蕴几何”统一语言综述超对称四维有效理论的沼泽地几何,并推测该描述可扩展至无超对称情形,核心贡献在于阐明规范耦合与Ooguri-Vafa流形的性质。

摘要:

本文的目的有两个。首先,我们使用一种我们称之为“内蕴几何”(domestic geometry)的新的统一语言,详细回顾了超对称四维有效理论的沼泽地纲领的几何方面。内蕴几何是特殊Kähler几何的推广,它不要求底层流形是Kähler的或具有复结构。所有四维超引力理论都由内蕴几何描述。与特殊Kähler几何一样,内蕴几何承载形式膜振幅:当内蕴几何描述一个一致的量子引力理论的超对称低能极限时,其形式膜振幅具有成为实际膜的正确性质。四维超引力内蕴几何的主要数据是其规范耦合,它被视为从满足几何Ooguri-Vafa猜想的流形到Siegel簇的映射;为了理解量子一致规范耦合的性质,我们讨论了这类“Ooguri-Vafa”流形的几个新方面,包括它们的Liouville性质。我们的第二个目标是提出一些关于将沼泽地纲领扩展到无超对称有效引力理论的新推测。其思想是,量子一致有效理论的内蕴几何描述,可能在某些限定条件下,也适用于非超对称情形。

英文摘要:

The purpose of this paper is two-fold. First we review in detail the geometric aspects of the swampland program for supersymmetric 4d effective theories using a new and unifying language we dub `domestic geometry', the generalization of special Kähler geometry which does not require the underlying manifold to be Kähler or have a complex structure. All 4d SUGRAs are described by domestic geometry. As special Kähler geometries, domestic geometries carry formal brane amplitudes: when the domestic geometry describes the supersymmetric low-energy limit of a consistent quantum theory of gravity, its formal brane amplitudes have the right properties to be actual branes. The main datum of the domestic geometry of a 4d SUGRA is its gauge coupling, seen as a map from a manifold which satisfies the geometric Ooguri-Vafa conjectures to the Siegel variety; to understand the properties of the quantum-consistent gauge couplings we discuss several novel aspects of such `Ooguri-Vafa' manifolds, including their Liouville properties. Our second goal is to present some novel speculation on the extension of the swampland program to no-supersymmetric effective theories of gravity. The idea is that the domestic geometric description of the quantum-consistent effective theories extends, possibly with some qualifications, also to the non-supersymmetric case.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑