arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1611.08798physics.acc-ph
收藏

β_g=0.61和β_g = 0.9,650 MHz椭圆SRF腔的次级碰撞研究

Multipacting studies of beta_g=0.61 and beta_g =0.9, 650 MHz Elliptical SRF Cavities

Ram Prakash, Arup Ratan Jana, Vinit Kumar

摘要:

多重放电被认为是超导射频(SRF)腔的一种性能限制现象。数值模拟是必不可少的先发制人的实验观察到的多重碰撞条件。容易获得的代码(例如FISHPACT、MULTIPACT、CST等)被广泛用于模拟这种情况下的多重碰撞现象。大多数的当代二维(2D)代码无法检测在椭圆腔中的二次碰撞,因为他们使用一个简单的二次发射模型,其中一个恒定值的次级电子的发射动能被假定。一些三维(3D)程序,通过遵循次级电子发射动能的概率分布,使用更真实和复杂的次级发射模型(Furman模型),能够正确地预测微碰撞的发生。然而,这些3D软件需要大量的数据处理,并且比当代的2D代码慢。本文基于Furman模型,开发了一个二维轴对称结构的微碰撞分析程序。由于我们的代码是2D的,所以它比3D代码更快。这使得有可能在合理的计算时间内执行精确的多重碰撞分析,从而实现与3D代码的情况一样好的精度,但需要显著更少的计算时间。我们已经使用我们的代码来确定在beta_g =0.61和beta_g =0.9,650 MHz的中室椭圆腔中的Eacc值的多重碰撞倾向的范围,我们最近为建议的印度散斑中子源(ISNS)项目的中能量和高能量部分设计。

英文摘要:

Multipacting is seen as a performance limiting phenomenon for the superconducting radio frequency (SRF) cavities. Numerical simulations are essential to pre-empt the experimentally observed multipacting conditions. Readily available codes(e.g. FISHPACT, MULTIPACT,CST etc.) are widely used to simulate the phenomenon of multipacting in such cases. Most of the contemporary two dimensional (2D) codes are unable to detect multipacting in the elliptical cavities because they use a simplistic secondary emission model, where a constant value of emission kinetic energy of secondary electrons is assumed. Some three-dimensional (3D) codes, which use a more realistic and sophisticated secondary emission model (Furman model) by following a probability distribution for the emission kinetic energy of secondary electrons, are able to correctly predict the occurance of multipacting. These 3D softwares however require large data handling and are slower than contemporary 2D codes. We have developed a 2D code for the multipacting analysis for axisymmetric structures, which is based on the Furman model. Since our code is 2D, it is faster than the 3D codes. This makes it possible to perform an accurate multipacting analysis of multipacting within a resaonalble computational time, thus achieving an accuracy as good as in the case of 3D codes, but requiring significantly less computing time. We have used our code for determining the multipacting prone range of values for Eacc in beta_g =0.61 and beta_g =0.9, 650 MHz mid-cell elliptical cavities that we have recently designed for the medium and high energy section of the proposed Indian Spallation Neutron Source (ISNS) project.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑