Neighborhood Lights Out is a game played on graphs. Begin with a graph and a vertex labeling of the graph from the set $\{0,1,2,\dots, \ell-1\}$ for $\ell \in \mathbb{N}$. The game is played by toggling vertices: when a vertex is toggled, that vertex and each of its neighbors has its label increased by $1$ (modulo $\ell$). The game is won when every vertex has label 0. For any $n\in\mathbb{N}$ it is clear that one cannot win the game on $K_n$ unless the initial labeling assigns all vertices the same label. Given that the $K_n$ has the maximum number of edges of any simple graph on $n$ vertices…
An odd prime labeling is a variation of a prime labeling in which the vertices of a graph of order~$n$ are labeled with the distinct odd integers $1$ to $2n-1$ so that the labels of adjacent vertices are relatively prime. This paper investigates many different classes of graphs including disjoint unions of cycles, stacked prisms, and particular types of caterpillars, by using various methods to construct odd prime labelings. We also demonstrate progress toward proving a conjecture that all prime graphs have an odd prime labeling.
In this article we introduce the notion of weak harmonic labeling of a graph, a generalization of the concept of harmonic labeling defined recently by Benjamini et al. that allows extension to finite graphs and graphs with leaves. We present various families of examples and provide several constructions that extend a given weak harmonic labeling to larger graphs. In particular, we use finite weak models to produce new examples of (strong) harmonic labelings. As a main result, we provide a characterization of weakly labeled graphs in terms of harmonic subsets of the integers and use it to compu…
For a graph $G$, a $k$-radio labeling of $G$ is the assignment of positive integers to the vertices of $G$ such that the closer two vertices are on the graph, the greater the difference in labels is required to be. Specifically, $\vert f(u)-f(v)\vert\geq k + 1 - d(u,v)$ where $f(u)$ is the label on a vertex $u$ in $G$. Here, we consider the case when $G$ is the Cartesian products of complete graphs. Specifically we wish to find optimal labelings that use consecutive integers and determine when this is possible. We build off of a paper by Amanda Niedzialomski and construct a framework for disco…
Technical University of Ostrava(俄斯特拉发工业大学);Institute of Mathematics, Physics and Mechanics(数学、物理与力学研究所);University of Primorska, FAMNIT(沿海大学FAMNIT学院);University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education(卢布尔雅那大学教育学院);University of Primorska, Institute Andrej Marušič(沿海大学安德烈亚·马鲁西奇研究所)
An antimagic labeling for a graph $G$ with $m$ edges is a bijection $f: E(G) \to \{1, 2, \dots, m\}$ so that $ϕ_f(u) \neq ϕ_f(v)$ holds for any pair of distinct vertices $u, v \in V(G)$, where $ϕ_f(x) = \sum_{x \in e} f(e)$. A strongly antimagic labeling is an antimagic labeling with an additional condition: For any $u, v \in V(G)$, if $°(u) > °(v)$, then $ϕ_f(u) > ϕ_f(v)$. A graph $G$ is strongly antimagic if it admits a strongly antimagic labeling. We present inductive properties of strongly antimagic labelings of graphs. This approach leads to simplified proofs that spiders and double spide…
In this paper, we study the $L(2, 1)$-Labeling of the Mycielski and the iterated Mycielski of graphs in general. For a graph $G$ and all $t\geq 1$, we give sharp bounds for $λ(M^t(G))$ the $L(2, 1)$-labeling number of the $t$-th iterated Mycielski in terms of the number of iterations $t$, the order $n$, the maximum degree $\bigtriangleup$, and $λ(G)$ the $L(2, 1)$-labeling number of $G$. For $t=1$, we present necessary and sufficient conditions between the $4$-star matching number of the complement graph and $λ(M(G))$ the $L(2, 1)$-labeling number of the Mycielski of a graph, with some applica…
Let $G = (V,E)$ be a connected simple graph of order $p$ and size $q$. A graph $G$ is called local antimagic (total) if $G$ admits a local antimagic (total) labeling. A bijection $g : E \to \{1,2,\ldots,q\}$ is called a local antimagic labeling of $G$ if for any two adjacent vertices $u$ and $v$, we have $g^+(u) \ne g^+(v)$, where $g^+(u) = \sum_{e\in E(u)} g(e)$, and $E(u)$ is the set of edges incident to $u$. Similarly, a bijection $f:V(G)\cup E(G)\to \{1,2,\ldots,p+q\}$ is called a local antimagic total labeling of $G$ if for any two adjacent vertices $u$ and $v$, we have $w_f(u)\ne w_f(v)$…