arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1608.06319astro-ph.SR
收藏

耀斑预报方法的比较I:来自“完全清除”研讨会的结果

A Comparison of Flare Forecasting Methods, I: Results from the "All-Clear" Workshop

G. Barnes, K. D. Leka, C. J. Schrijver, T. Colak, R. Qahwaji, O. W. Ashamari, Y. Yuan, J. Zhang, R. T. J. McAteer, D. S. Bloomfield, P. A. Higgins, P. T. Gallag… 展开作者

G. Barnes, K. D. Leka, C. J. Schrijver, T. Colak, R. Qahwaji, O. W. Ashamari, Y. Yuan, J. Zhang, R. T. J. McAteer, D. S. Bloomfield, P. A. Higgins, P. T. Gallagher, D. A. Falconer, M. K. Georgoulis, M. S. Wheatland, C. Balch, T. Dunn, E. L. Wagner

摘要:

太阳耀斑产生的辐射几乎可以立即对近地环境产生影响,因此必须预测耀斑,以减轻其负面影响。已经发表的利用光球磁场观测进行耀斑预测的方法数量激增,对每种方法的效果有不同的说法。由于使用的分析技术和数据集不同,基本上不可能比较文献的结果。大太阳耀斑的低事件发生率加剧了这一问题。气象界早已认识到罕见事件预报的挑战,但空间天气界尚未充分认识到这一点。2009年在科罗拉多州博尔德举行的机构间“解除警报”预报讲习班期间,对一些现有算法在通用数据集上的性能进行了比较,特别是MDI的视线磁场和连续强度图像,对事件的构成具有一致的定义。我们证明了这种系统的比较,并使用标准的验证统计,以确定什么是一个很好的预测方案的重要性。当以这种方式进行比较时,没有一种方法明显优于所有其他方法,这可能部分是由于不同方法用于表征活动区域的参数之间的强相关性。对于M级耀斑及以上,这套方法倾向于弱阳性的技能得分(用几个不同的指标测量),没有参与的方法证明比气候预测更好。

英文摘要:

Solar flares produce radiation which can have an almost immediate effect on the near-Earth environment, making it crucial to forecast flares in order to mitigate their negative effects. The number of published approaches to flare forecasting using photospheric magnetic field observations has proliferated, with varying claims about how well each works. Because of the different analysis techniques and data sets used, it is essentially impossible to compare the results from the literature. This problem is exacerbated by the low event rates of large solar flares. The challenges of forecasting rare events have long been recognized in the meteorology community, but have yet to be fully acknowledged by the space weather community. During the interagency workshop on "all clear" forecasts held in Boulder, CO in 2009, the performance of a number of existing algorithms was compared on common data sets, specifically line-of-sight magnetic field and continuum intensity images from MDI, with consistent definitions of what constitutes an event. We demonstrate the importance of making such systematic comparisons, and of using standard verification statistics to determine what constitutes a good prediction scheme. When a comparison was made in this fashion, no one method clearly outperformed all others, which may in part be due to the strong correlations among the parameters used by different methods to characterize an active region. For M-class flares and above, the set of methods tends towards a weakly positive skill score (as measured with several distinct metrics), with no participating method proving substantially better than climatological forecasts.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑