arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2202.08776astro-ph.SRastro-ph.IM
收藏

机器学习方法用于太阳耀斑预报：复杂模型是否更优？

Machine Learning Approaches to Solar-Flare Forecasting: Is Complex Better?

Varad Deshmukh, Srinivas Baskar, Elizabeth Bradley, Thomas Berger, James D. Meiss

发表信息：
A&A 674, A159 (2023)
阅读 PDF
arXiv 页面 ↗HTML 原文 ↗

AI总结：

本研究通过对比不同复杂度的机器学习模型及不同特征集，发现简单模型优于复杂模型，且基于形状的抽象特征与手工特征同样有效，降维不影响预测性能。

摘要：

近年来，利用机器学习方法预测太阳耀斑的兴趣日益增长。早期的相关工作采用了相对简单的模型，将太阳黑子活动区观测中提取的特征与已知的耀斑事件进行关联。这些模型通常使用受物理学启发的特征，这些特征由专家精心挑选，以捕捉此类磁场结构的主要特征。随着时间的推移，所涉及模型的 sophistication 和复杂性不断增长。然而，在特征集的选择上几乎没有演变，也没有系统性地研究额外的模型复杂性是否真正有用。我们的目标是解决这些问题。为此，我们比较了基于机器学习的、具有不同复杂度的耀斑预报模型的相对预测性能。我们还重新审视了特征集设计，使用拓扑数据分析从活动区的磁场图像中提取基于形状的特征。通过使用超参数训练来公平比较不同机器学习模型在不同特征集上的表现，我们表明具有较少自由参数的更简单模型通常比更复杂的模型表现更好，即强大的工具并不一定能保证更好的预测性能。其次，我们发现，对于耀斑预测而言，抽象的、基于形状的特征所包含的有用信息与太阳物理界多年来开发的手工特征集一样多。最后，我们研究了使用主成分分析进行降维的效果，以表明精简后的特征集整体上表现与相应的全维版本一样好。

英文摘要：

Recently, there has been growing interest in the use of machine-learning methods for predicting solar flares. Initial efforts along these lines employed comparatively simple models, correlating features extracted from observations of sunspot active regions with known instances of flaring. Typically, these models have used physics-inspired features that have been carefully chosen by experts in order to capture the salient features of such magnetic field structures. Over time, the sophistication and complexity of the models involved has grown. However, there has been little evolution in the choice of feature sets, nor any systematic study of whether the additional model complexity is truly useful. Our goal is to address these issues. To that end, we compare the relative prediction performance of machine-learning-based, flare-forecasting models with varying degrees of complexity. We also revisit the feature set design, using topological data analysis to extract shape-based features from magnetic field images of the active regions. Using hyperparameter training for fair comparison of different machine-learning models across different feature sets, we show that simpler models with fewer free parameters \textit{generally perform better than more-complicated models}, ie., powerful machinery does not necessarily guarantee better prediction performance. Secondly, we find that \textit{abstract, shape-based features contain just as much useful information}, for the purposes of flare prediction, as the set of hand-crafted features developed by the solar-physics community over the years. Finally, we study the effects of dimensionality reduction, using principal component analysis, to show that streamlined feature sets, overall, perform just as well as the corresponding full-dimensional versions.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。

↑