arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1201.4565physics.soc-phcs.MAcs.SInlin.AO
收藏

离散意见模型作为CODA模型的极限情形

Discrete Opinion models as a limit case of the CODA model

André C. R. Martins

摘要:

观点动力学模型,对于他们中的大多数,可以分为离散和连续。它们被用于不同的情况,它们之间的关系并不明确。在这里,我们将探讨一个选择是离散的,但意见是一个连续函数的模型(连续意见和离散行动,CODA模型)和传统的离散模型之间的关系。我将证明,当尾句被修改,包括推理的影响,一个代理人可以对自己的邻居,同意和不同意不再有同样的重要性。当一个代理认为自己越来越有影响力时,我们将研究极限,我们将看到一个恢复离散动态,就像在那个极限中的选民模型一样

英文摘要:

Opinion Dynamics models can be, for most of them, divided between discrete and continuous. They are used in different circumstances and the relationship between them is not clear. Here we will explore the relationship between a model where choices are discrete but opinions are a continuous function (the Continuous Opinions and Discrete Actions, CODA, model) and traditional discrete models. I will show that, when CODA is altered to include reasoning about the influence one agent can have on its own neighbors, agreement and disagreement no longer have the same importance. The limit when an agent considers itself to be more and more influential will be studied and we will see that one recovers discrete dynamics, like those of the Voter model in that limit

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑