arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1002.0525astro-ph.COgr-qc
收藏

宇宙膨胀的角尺寸检验

Angular size test on the expansion of the Universe

Martin Lopez-Corredoira

摘要:

假设标准宇宙学模型是正确的,具有相同光度的星系在z=3.2时的平均线性尺寸比z=0时小6倍,并且它们的平均角尺寸对于给定的光度近似与1/z成正比。无论是早期形成的星系具有更高密度的假设,还是它们的光度演化,合并比率,或由于类星体反馈机制而产生的大量外流,都不足以证明如此强烈的尺寸演化。此外,在高红移,本征紫外表面亮度将是高得令人望而却步的这种演变,和速度色散比观察到的要高得多。我们在这里探索另一种可能性,以克服这个问题,考虑不同的宇宙学场景,可能使观察到的角大小与较弱的演化兼容。其中一个模型,一个非常简单的唯象外推的线性哈勃定律在一个欧几里得静态宇宙,符合角大小与红移的依赖性相当好,这也是大约成比例的1/z与这个宇宙学模型。虽然误差条允许轻微的尺寸/光度变化,但没有特别推导出的自由参数。Ia型超新星的哈勃图也可以用这个模型来解释,没有特别的拟合参数。答:我并不认为真正的宇宙是静态的。我的目的只是讨论哪些理论模型更适合观测宇宙学的数据。

英文摘要:

Assuming the standard cosmological model as correct, the average linear size of galaxies with the same luminosity is six times smaller at z=3.2 than at z=0, and their average angular size for a given luminosity is approximately proportional to 1/z. Neither the hypothesis that galaxies which formed earlier have much higher densities nor their luminosity evolution, mergers ratio, or massive outflows due to a quasar feedback mechanism are enough to justify such a strong size evolution. Also, at high redshift, the intrinsic ultraviolet surface brightness would be prohibitively high with this evolution, and the velocity dispersion much higher than observed. We explore here another possibility to overcome this problem by considering different cosmological scenarios that might make the observed angular sizes compatible with a weaker evolution. One of the models explored, a very simple phenomenological extrapolation of the linear Hubble law in a Euclidean static universe, fits the angular size vs. redshift dependence quite well, which is also approximately proportional to 1/z with this cosmological model. There are no free parameters derived ad hoc, although the error bars allow a slight size/luminosity evolution. The type Ia supernovae Hubble diagram can also be explained in terms of this model with no ad hoc fitted parameter. WARNING: I do not argue here that the true Universe is static. My intention is just to discuss which theoretical models provide a better fit to the data of observational cosmology.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑