arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 0707.3244math.NTmath.CO
收藏

$ζ(\{2\}^m)$和$ζ(\{3,1\}^n)$的一种奇异混洗关系

An exotic shuffle relation of $ζ(\{2\}^m)$ and $ζ(\{3,1\}^n)$

Jianqiang Zhao

摘要:

在这个简短的说明中,我们将提供一个新的和更短的证明,以下奇异的洗牌关系的多个zeta值:$$ζ(\{2\}^m \sha\{3,1\}^n)={2n+m\choose m} \frac{π^{4n+2m}}{(2n+1)\cdot (4n+2m+1)!}.$$这是证明了Zagier时,n=0,由布罗德赫斯特时,$m=0$,并由Borwein,布拉德利和布罗德赫斯特时,m=1。一般来说,这是由Bowman和Bradley在\emph{The algebra and combinatorics of shuffles and multiple zeta values},J. of Combinatorial Theory,Series A,Vol. \textbf{97}(1)(2002),43- 63中证明的。在一般情况下,我们的想法是使用Borwein等人的方法,以减少上述一般关系到一些家庭的组合恒等式,可以验证的WZ-方法。

英文摘要:

In this short note we will provide a new and shorter proof of the following exotic shuffle relation of multiple zeta values: $$ζ(\{2\}^m \sha\{3,1\}^n)={2n+m\choose m} \frac{π^{4n+2m}}{(2n+1)\cdot (4n+2m+1)!}.$$ This was proved by Zagier when n=0, by Broadhurst when $m=0$, and by Borwein, Bradley, and Broadhurst when m=1. In general this was proved by Bowman and Bradley in \emph{The algebra and combinatorics of shuffles and multiple zeta values}, J. of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, Vol. \textbf{97} (1)(2002), 43--63. Our idea in the general case is to use the method of Borwein et al. to reduce the above general relation to some families of combinatorial identities which can be verified by WZ-method.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑