arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv math/9903153math.CO
收藏

三人公平游戏

Three-player impartial games

James Propp

摘要:

过去对公平的三人组合博弈进行分类的努力(李和斯特拉芬的理论)对对手的理性以及联盟的形成和行为做出了各种限制性假设。相反,人们可能会对这些问题采取不可知论的态度,只寻求理解在什么情况下一个参与者对其他两个参与者的联合力量有获胜的策略。通过将我们自己限制在这个更温和的理论目标上,并通过将两个博弈视为等价的,如果它们在所有析取和中是可互换的,就单人获胜而言,我们可以得到一个有趣的类似于三人公平博弈的格伦迪值。

英文摘要:

Past efforts to classify impartial three-player combinatorial games (the theories of Li and Straffin) have made various restrictive assumptions about the rationality of one's opponents and the formation and behavior of coalitions. One may instead adopt an agnostic attitude towards such issues, and seek only to understand in what circumstances one player has a winning strategy against the combined forces of the other two. By limiting ourselves to this more modest theoretical objective, and by regarding two games as being equivalent if they are interchangeable in all disjunctive sums,as far as single-player winnability is concerned, we can obtain an interesting analogue of Grundy values for three-player impartial games.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑