arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv math/0011179math.DGhep-thmath.AG
收藏

特殊Lagrange纤维化的奇性与SYZ猜想

Singularities of special Lagrangian fibrations and the SYZ Conjecture

Dominic Joyce

摘要:

SYZ猜想解释了镜像Calabi-Yau 3-folds M,M'之间的镜像对称性,即在同一基底B上的特殊拉格朗日纤维f:M -> B和f':M' -> B,其纤维是对偶3-tori,除了奇异纤维。在证明SYZ猜想(甚至找到正确的陈述)的主要问题之一是,特殊拉格朗日3-折叠和纤维化的奇异性知之甚少。本文研究了特殊拉格朗日纤维化的奇异性。我们的主要严格结果是构造了C^3的开子集上的特殊拉格朗日纤维化的例子。最简单的显式给出,其余的是使用作者的三篇论文math.DG/0111324,math.DG/0111326,math.DG/0204343中关于C^3中U(1)-不变特殊拉格朗日3-折叠的解析存在性结果构造的。然后,我们认为,没有充分的证据,我们的例子中的一些功能也应该持有特殊的拉格朗日纤维化f:M --> B的(几乎)卡-丘3倍,特别是在一般情况下。特别地,f将不是光滑的,而只是分段光滑的,并且f的判别式(奇异纤维的集合)将在B中具有余维1,并且通常由“带”组成。最后给出了SYZ猜想的一些结论,这些结论与SYZ猜想的一些更强的陈述相矛盾。

英文摘要:

The SYZ Conjecture explains Mirror Symmetry between mirror Calabi-Yau 3-folds M,M' in terms of special Lagrangian fibrations f : M --> B and f' : M' --> B over the same base B, whose fibres are dual 3-tori, except for singular fibres. One of the main problems in proving the SYZ Conjecture (or even in finding the right statement of it) is that the singularities of special Lagrangian 3-folds and fibrations are poorly understood. This paper studies the singularities of special Lagrangian fibrations. Our main rigorous results are the construction of examples of special Lagrangian fibrations on open subsets of C^3. The simplest are given explicitly, and the rest are constructed using analytic existence results from the author's three papers math.DG/0111324, math.DG/0111326, math.DG/0204343 on U(1)-invariant special Lagrangian 3-folds in C^3. We then argue, without full proofs, that some features of our examples should also hold for special Lagrangian fibrations f : M --> B of (almost) Calabi-Yau 3-folds, especially in the generic case. In particular, f will not be smooth but only piecewise-smooth, and the discriminant (set of singular fibres) of f will be of codimension 1 in B, and will typically be composed of 'ribbons'. Finally we draw some conclusions on the SYZ Conjecture, which contradict some stronger statements of it.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑