arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2602.02587physics.soc-phcond-mat.stat-mechcs.GTq-bio.PE
收藏

在空间显式囚徒困境模型中欺骗的演变

The Evolution of Lying in a Spatially-Explicit Prisoner's Dilemma Model

SUNY Geneseo(纽约州立大学杰纳西奥分校)

Gregg Hartvigsen

AI总结:

该研究通过空间显式囚徒困境模型探讨了欺骗行为的演变,发现当诚实度较高时,合作者群体稳定;当诚实度较低时,背叛者群体稳定。

摘要:

我呈现了一个在环形晶格上进行的囚徒困境空间模型的结果。每个个体有默认策略,即合作(C)或背叛(D)。测试了两种策略,包括“以牙还牙”(TFT),其中个体玩对方上一轮的玩法,或者仅仅玩默认的玩法。每个个体还有一个概率(0 ≤ P_truth ≤ 1)报告他们上一轮的玩法。这个参数可以随时间演变,使个体例如成为背叛者,但表现出合作者的身份。这导致了有趣的动态,其中混合的背叛者和合作者的群体(P_truth ≥ 0.75)趋向于诚实的合作者群体。同样,混合群体(P_truth < 0.7)成为说谎的背叛者群体。这两种群体都是稳定的,因为它们的平均得分高于P_truth具有中间值的群体。讨论了该模型在人类和动物中的应用。

英文摘要:

I present the results from a spatial model of the prisoner's dilemma, played on a toroidal lattice. Each individual has a default strategy of either cooperating ($C$) or defecting ($D$). Two strategies were tested, including ``tit-for-tat'' (TFT), in which individuals play their opponent's last play, or simply playing their default play. Each individual also has a probability of telling the truth ($0 \leq P_{truth} \leq 1$) about their last play. This parameter, which can evolve over time, allows individuals to be, for instance, a defector but present as a cooperator regarding their last play. This leads to interesting dynamics where mixed populations of defectors and cooperators with $P_{truth} \geq 0.75$ move toward populations of truth-telling cooperators. Likewise, mixed populations with $P_{truth} < 0.7$ become populations of lying defectors. Both such populations are stable because they each have higher average scores than populations with intermediate values of $P_{truth}$. Applications of this model are discussed with regards to both humans and animals.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑