The strong Ramsey game $R(\mathcal{B}, H)$ is a two-player game played on a graph $\mathcal{B}$, referred to as the board, with a target graph $H$. In this game, two players, $P_1$ and $P_2$, alternately claim unclaimed edges of $\mathcal{B}$, starting with $P_1$. The goal is to claim a subgraph isomorphic to $H$, with the first player achieving this declared the winner. A fundamental open question, persisting for over three decades, asks whether there exists a graph $H$ such that in the game $R(K_n, H)$, $P_1$ does not have a winning strategy in a bounded number of moves as $n \to \infty$.
In this paper, we shift the focus to the variant $R(K_n \sqcup K_n, H)$, introduced by David, Hartarsky, and Tiba, where the board $K_n \sqcup K_n$ consists of two disjoint copies of $K_n$. We prove that there exist infinitely many graphs $H$ such that $P_1$ cannot win in $R(K_n \sqcup K_n, H)$ within a bounded number of moves through a concise proof. This perhaps provides evidence for the existence of examples to the above longstanding open problem.
The restricted $(m,n;N)$-online Ramsey game is a game played between two players, Builder and Painter. The game starts with $N$ isolated vertices. Each turn Builder picks an edge to build and Painter chooses whether that edge is red or blue, and Builder aims to create a red $K_m$ or blue $K_n$ in as few turns as possible. The restricted online Ramsey number $\tilde{r}(m,n;N)$ is the minimum number of turns that Builder needs to guarantee her win in the restricted $(m,n;N)$-online Ramsey game. We show that if $N=r(n,n)$, \[ \tilde{r}(n,n;N)\le \binom{N}{2} - Ω(N\log N), \] motivated by a questi…
We consider the strong Ramsey-type game $\mathcal{R}^{(k)}(\mathcal{H}, \aleph_0)$, played on the edge set of the infinite complete $k$-uniform hypergraph $K^k_{\mathbb{N}}$. Two players, called FP (the first player) and SP (the second player), take turns claiming edges of $K^k_{\mathbb{N}}$ with the goal of building a copy of some finite predetermined $k$-uniform hypergraph $\mathcal{H}$. The first player to build a copy of $\mathcal{H}$ wins. If no player has a strategy to ensure his win in finitely many moves, then the game is declared a draw. In this paper, we construct a $5$-uniform hyper…
The purpose of this paper is to introduce the idea of triangular Ramsey numbers and provide values as well as upper and lower bounds for them. To do this, the combinatorial game Mines is introduced; after some necessary theorems about triangular sets are proved. This game is easy enough that young children are able to play. The most basic variations of this game are analyzed and theorems about winning strategies and the existence of draws are proved. The game of Mines is then used to define triangular Ramsey numbers. Lower bounds are found for these triangular Ramsey numbers using the probabil…
Given a class $\mathcal{C}$ of graphs and a fixed graph $H$, the online Ramsey game for $H$ on $\mathcal C$ is a game between two players Builder and Painter as follows: an unbounded set of vertices is given as an initial state, and on each turn Builder introduces a new edge with the constraint that the resulting graph must be in $\mathcal C$, and Painter colors the new edge either red or blue. Builder wins the game if Painter is forced to make a monochromatic copy of $H$ at some point in the game. Otherwise, Painter can avoid creating a monochromatic copy of $H$ forever, and we say Painter wi…
We introduce a graph Ramsey game called Ramsey, Paper, Scissors. This game has two players, Proposer and Decider. Starting from an empty graph on $n$ vertices, on each turn Proposer proposes a potential edge and Decider simultaneously decides (without knowing Proposer's choice) whether to add it to the graph. Proposer cannot propose an edge which would create a triangle in the graph. The game ends when Proposer has no legal moves remaining, and Proposer wins if the final graph has independence number at least $s$. We prove a threshold phenomenon exists for this game by exhibiting randomized st…
In 1982, Harary introduced the concept of Ramsey achievement game on graphs. Given a graph $F$ with no isolated vertices. Consider the following game played on the complete graph $K_n$ by two players Alice and Bob. First, Alice colors one of the edges of $K_n$ blue, then Bob colors a different edge red, and so on. The first player who can complete the formation of $F$ in his color is the winner. The minimum $n$ for which Alice has a winning strategy is the achievement number of $F$, denoted by $a(F)$. If we replace $K_n$ in the game by the completed bipartite graph $K_{n,n}$, we get the bipart…
Consider a $n \times n$ tic-tac-toe board. In each field of the board, draw a smaller $n\times n$ tic-tac-toe board. Now let super tic-tac-toe (STTT) be a game where each player's move dictates which field on the larger board a player must make their next move. We will play an impartial game of STTT where each player uses X. We define a set of actions on a game board which gives rise to a group-action on the game that creates equivalent games. We will discuss how the structure of this group-action forms a Dihedral group.
A well-known result of Rödl and Ruciński states that for any graph $H$ there exists a constant $C$ such that if $p \geq C n^{- 1/m_2(H)}$, then the random graph $G_{n,p}$ is a.a.s. $H$-Ramsey, that is, any $2$-colouring of its edges contains a monochromatic copy of $H$. Aside from a few simple exceptions, the corresponding $0$-statement also holds, that is, there exists $c>0$ such that whenever $p\leq cn^{-1/m_2(H)}$ the random graph $G_{n,p}$ is a.a.s. not $H$-Ramsey. We show that near this threshold, even when $G_{n,p}$ is not $H$-Ramsey, it is often extremely close to being $H$-Ramsey. More…
The $(m,n)$-online Ramsey game is a combinatorial game between two players, Builder and Painter. Starting from an infinite set of isolated vertices, Builder draws an edge on each turn and Painter immediately paints it red or blue. Builder's goal is to force Painter to create either a red $K_m$ or a blue $K_n$ using as few turns as possible. The online Ramsey number $\tilde{r}(m,n)$ is the minimum number of edges Builder needs to guarantee a win in the $(m,n)$-online Ramsey game. By analyzing the special case where Painter plays randomly, we obtain an exponential improvement \[ \tilde{r}(n,n) \…
Given two graphs $G$ and $H$, a size Ramsey game is played on the edge set of $K_\mathbb{N}$. In every round, Builder selects an edge and Painter colours it red or blue. Builder's goal is to force Painter to create a red copy of $G$ or a blue copy of $H$ as soon as possible. The online (size) Ramsey number $\tilde r(G,H)$ is the number of rounds in the game provided Builder and Painter play optimally. We prove that $\tilde r(C_4,P_n)\le 2n-2$ for every $n\ge 8$. The upper bound matches the lower bound obtained by J. Cyman, T. Dzido, J. Lapinskas, and A. Lo, so we get $\tilde r(C_4,P_n)=2n-2$ f…
Consider the following one-player game played on an initially empty graph with $n$ vertices. At each stage a randomly selected new edge is added and the player must immediately color the edge with one of $r$ available colors. Her objective is to color as many edges as possible without creating a monochromatic copy of a fixed graph $F$. We use container and sparse regularity techniques to prove a tight upper bound on the typical duration of this game with an arbitrary, but fixed, number of colors for a family of $2$-balanced graphs. The bound confirms a conjecture of Marciniszyn, Spöhel and Ste…
Consider a two-player game between players Builder and Painter. Painter begins the game by picking a coloring of the edges of $K_n$, which is hidden from Builder. In each round, Builder points to an edge and Painter reveals its color. Builder's goal is to locate a particular monochromatic structure in Painter's coloring by revealing the color of as few edges as possible. The fewest number of turns required for Builder to win this game is known as the restricted online Ramsey number. In this paper, we consider the situation where this "particular monochromatic structure" is a large matching or …
Motivated by problems in percolation theory, we study the following 2-player positional game. Let $Λ_{m \times n}$ be a rectangular grid-graph with $m$ vertices in each row and $n$ vertices in each column. Two players, Maker and Breaker, play in alternating turns. On each of her turns, Maker claims $p$ (as-yet unclaimed) edges of the board $Λ_{m \times n}$, while on each of his turns Breaker claims $q$ (as-yet unclaimed) edges of the board and destroys them. Maker wins the game if she manages to claim all the edges of a crossing path joining the left-hand side of the board to its right-hand si…
For two graphs $B$ and $H$ the strong Ramsey game $\mathcal{R}(B,H)$ on the board $B$ and with target $H$ is played as follows. Two players alternately claim edges of $B$. The first player to build a copy of $H$ wins. If none of the players win, the game is declared a draw. A notorious open question of Beck asks whether the first player has a winning strategy in $\mathcal{R}(K_n,K_k)$ in bounded time as $n\rightarrow\infty$. Surprisingly, in a recent paper Hefetz et al. constructed a $5$-uniform hypergraph $\mathcal{H}$ for which they proved that the first player does not have a winning strate…
Positional games are a well-studied class of combinatorial game. In their usual form, two players take turns to play moves in a set (`the board'), and certain subsets are designated as `winning': the first person to occupy such a set wins the game. For these games, it is well known that (with correct play) the game cannot be a second-player win. In the avoidance (or misère) form, the first person to occupy such a set \emph{loses} the game. Here it would be natural to expect that the game cannot be a first-player win, at least if the game is transitive, meaning that all points of the board look…
By now, the Maker-Breaker connectivity game on a complete graph $K_n$ or on a random graph $G\sim G_{n,p}$ is well studied. Recently, London and Pluhár suggested a variant in which Maker always needs to choose her edges in such a way that her graph stays connected. By their results it follows that for this connected version of the game, the threshold bias on $K_n$ and the threshold probability on $G\sim G_{n,p}$ for winning the game drastically differ from the corresponding values for the usual Maker-Breaker version, assuming Maker's bias to be $1$. However, they observed that the threshold bi…
A positional game is a game where two players sequentially label vertices of a hypergraph, consisting of a board and a collection of winning sets, with colors assigned to each player until all vertices of the board are claimed. The first player to claim all elements of a winning set wins. If no player claims all the elements of a winning set, then the game results in a draw. One such example of a positional game is Tic-Tac-Toe, where the board is the 3-by-3 grid. The popular game of Connect-4 is an example of what we define to be a "restricted positional game". Here, we introduce another examp…
Given two graph families $\mathcal H_1$ and $\mathcal H_2$, a size Ramsey game is played on the edge set of $K_\mathbb{N}$. In every round, Builder selects an edge and Painter colours it red or blue. Builder is trying to force Painter to create as soon as possible a red copy of a graph from $\mathcal H_1$ or a blue copy of a graph from $\mathcal H_2$. The online (size) Ramsey number $\tilde{r}(\mathcal H_1,\mathcal H_2)$ is the smallest number of rounds in the game provided Builder and Painter play optimally. We prove that if $\mathcal H_1$ is the family of all odd cycles and $\mathcal H_2$ is…
Waiter-Client and Client-Waiter games are two-player, perfect information games, with no chance moves, played on a finite set (board) with special subsets known as the winning sets. Each round of the biased $(1:q)$ game begins with Waiter offering $q+1$ previously unclaimed elements of the board to Client, who claims one. The $q$ elements remaining are then claimed by Waiter. If Client fully claims a winning set by the time all board elements have been offered, he wins in the Client-Waiter game and loses in the Waiter-Client game. We give an estimate for the threshold bias of the $(1:q)$ Waite…
An online Ramsey game is a game between Builder and Painter, alternating in turns. They are given a graph $H$ and a graph $G$ of an infinite set of independent vertices. In each round Builder draws an edge and Painter colors it either red or blue. Builder wins if after some finite round there is a monochromatic copy of the graph $H$, otherwise Painter wins. The online Ramsey number $\widetilde{r}(H)$ is the minimum number of rounds such that Builder can force a monochromatic copy of $H$ in $G$. This is an analogy to the size-Ramsey number $\overline{r}(H)$ defined as the minimum number such th…
We give a simple and short proof of the fact that the board game of Y cannot end in a draw. Our proof, based on the analogous result for the game of Hex (the so-called 'Hex Theorem'), is purely topological and does not depend on the shape of the board. We also include a simplified version of Gale's proof of Hex Theorem.
Given two graphs $G$ and $H$, the online Ramsey number $\tilde{r}(G,H)$ is defined to be the minimum number of rounds that Builder can always guarantee a win in the following $(G, H)$-online Ramsey game between Builder and Painter. Starting from an infinite set of isolated vertices, in each round Builder draws an edge between some two vertices, and Painter immediately colors it red or blue. Builder's goal is to force either a red copy of $G$ or a blue copy of $H$ in as few rounds as possible, while Painter's goal is to delay it for as many rounds as possible. Let $K_{1,3}$ denote a star with t…
In a delightful article that recently appeared in Mathematics Magazine, David and Lori Mccune analyze the board game "Count Your Chickens!", recommended to children three and up. Alas, they use the advanced theory of Markov chains, that presupposes a knowledge of linear algebra, that few three-years-olds are likely to understand. Here we present a much simpler, more intuitive, approach, that while unlikely to be understood by three-year-olds, will probably be understood by a smart 14-year-old. Moreover, our approach accomplishes much more, and is more efficient. It uses symbolic, rather than n…
Tumbleweed is a popular two-player perfect-information new territorial game played at the prestigious Mind Sport Olympiad. We define a generalized version of the game, where the board size is arbitrary and so is the possible number of neutral stones. Our result: the complexity of deciding for a given configuration which of the players has a winning strategy is PSPACE-complete. The proof is by a log-space reduction from a Boolean formula game of T.J. Schaefer, known to be PSPACE-complete. We embed the non-planar Schaefer game within the planar Tumbleweed board without using proper "bridges", th…
对于任何图$F$和任何整数$r\geq 2$，表示为$m^*(F,r)$的\emph{online vertex-Ramsey density of $F$ and $r$}是通过确定性两人Ramsey型游戏（Painter vs.\ Builder）。该参数在最近的论文\cite{mrs11}中引入，其中表明在线顶点-拉姆齐密度决定了类似概率单人游戏的阈值（Painter vs.\二项随机图$G_{n,p}$）。对于一个大类的图$F$，包括团，圈，完全二分图，超立方体，车轮，和任意大小的星，一个简单的贪婪策略是最佳的画家和封闭的公式$m^*(F,r)$是已知的。在这项工作中，我们表明，对于$F=P_\ell$是一个（长）路径的情况下，图片是非常不同的。不难看出，对于适当定义的整数$k^*(P_\ell,r)$，$m^*(P_\ell,r)= 1-1/k^*(P_\ell,r)$，贪婪策略给出了$k^*(P_\ell,r)\geq \ell^r$的下界。我们构建和分析画家的策略，提高这个贪婪的下限由一个因子多项式在$\ell$，我们表明，没有超多项式的改善是可能的。
