arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2402.09490hep-th
收藏

具有 $1\leq N_F\leq N_c$ 个夸克味的 ${\cal N}=1\\,\\, SU(N_c)$ SQCD 中禁闭相与 Higgs 相之间的相变

Phase transitions between confinement and higgs phases in ${\cal N}=1\,\, SU(N_c)$ SQCD with $1\leq N_F\leq N_c$ quark flavors

Victor L. Chernyak

AI总结:

本文研究了标准4维SQCD中禁闭相与Higgs相的转变,通过引入规范不变序参量证明两者间发生的是真正的相变而非解析交叉,并指出Fradkin-Shenker模型因缺乏真实禁闭而仅表现为交叉。

摘要:

本文考虑了标准的 4 维 ${\cal N}=1\\,\\,SU(N_c)$ SQCD,其具有 $1\leq N_F\leq N_c$ 个质量为 $m_{Q,i}$ 的夸克味。文献 \cite{ch1} 中引入了规范不变序参量 $\rho$,用于区分禁闭相(对应 $\rho=0$)和 Higgs 相(对应 $\rho\neq 0$)。通过针对这些理论中禁闭和 Higgs 机制之间不同转变变体的一系列独立论证,本文表明这些机制之间的转变不是交叉,而是相变。在文献 \cite{FS} 中,E.Fradkin 和 S.H.Shenker 考虑了一个非常特殊的 $SU(N_c)$ QCD 理论,其中包含 $N_F=N_c$ 个有缺陷的标量“夸克”。文献 \cite{FS} 的结论是,禁闭和 Higgs 机制之间的转变是解析交叉。尽管文献 \cite{FS} 中考虑的理论非常特殊,但经验表明,至今仍有一种广泛流传的观点认为该结论具有普遍适用性。文献 \cite{ch1}、\cite{ch2} 批评了该模型 \cite{FS},认为它与带有标准标量夸克(具备所有物理自由度)的标准非超对称 $SU(N_c)\\,\\,N_F=N_c$ QCD 理论不兼容且差异巨大。需要强调的是,模型 \cite{FS} 实际上是 Stuckelberg $SU(N_c)$ YM 理论,没有动力学电夸克,且所有 $N_c^2-1$ 个电胶子均具有手动固定的非零质量。该理论中没有真正的禁闭,它仅永久处于手动完全 Higgs 化(即凝聚)的相中。这就是该理论中出现交叉的原因。而在具有标准标量夸克的理论中,禁闭(在 $0 < |v|\ll Λ_{QCD}$ 时)和 Higgs(在 $|v|\ggΛ_{QCD}$ 时)机制之间存在相变。

英文摘要:

Considered is the standard 4-dimensional ${\cal N}=1\,\,SU(N_c)$ SQCD with $1\leq N_F\leq N_c$ quark flavors with masses $m_{Q,i}$. {\bf The gauge invariant order parameter $ρ$ is introduced in \cite{ch1} distinguishing confinement (with $ρ=0$) and higgs (with $ρ\neq 0$) phases}. Using a number of independent arguments for different variants of transition between the confinement and higgs regimes in these theories, it is shown that {\bf transitions between these regimes are not crossovers but the phase transitions}. In \cite{FS} the very special $SU(N_c)$ QCD theory with $N_F=N_c$ defective scalar "quarks" was considered by E.Fradkin and S.H.Shenker. The conclusion of \cite{FS} was that {\bf the transition between the confinement and higgs regimes is the analytic crossover}. And although the theory considered in \cite{FS} was very specific, the experience shows that up to now there is a widely spread opinion that this conclusion has general applicability. This model \cite{FS} is criticized in \cite{ch1},\cite{ch2} as incompatible with and very different from the standard non-SUSY $SU(N_c)\,\,N_F=N_c$ QCD theory with standard scalar quarks with all their physical degrees of freedom. It is emphasized that this model \cite{FS} is really {\bf the Stuckelberg $SU(N_c)$ YM-theory with no dynamical electric quarks and massive all $N_c^2-1$ electric gluons with fixed by hands nonzero masses}. There is no genuine confinement in this theory, it stays permanently in the completely higgsed (i.e. condensed) by hands phase only. And this is a reason for a crossover in this theory. While in the theory with standard scalar quarks there is the phase transition between the confinement (at $0 < |v|\ll Λ_{QCD}$) and higgs (at $|v|\ggΛ_{QCD}$) regimes.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑