arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2304.08049econ.GNq-fin.EC
收藏

气候变化空间与时间变异性的经济后果

Economic consequences of the spatial and temporal variability of climate change

Francisco Estrada, Richard S. J. Tol, Wouter Botzen

AI总结:

本文指出综合评估模型忽略气候变化空间变异会导致损害被低估23-36%,并量化了由此产生的数万亿至数十万亿美元额外经济损失,主张模型应纳入更完整的气候条件描述。

摘要:

综合评估模型(IAMs)中的损害函数将气候变化映射为经济影响,并构成了社会碳成本大多数估算的基础。这些函数中隐含着一个不合理的假设,即气候变化的空间变异(Svar)和时间变异性(Tvar)被限制为零。这可能会使损害估算和来自IAMs的气候政策建议产生偏差。虽然文献中已经研究了Tvar的影响,但Svar的影响及其与Tvar的相互作用尚未被研究。在此,我们提出了考虑Tvar和Svar以及各部门损害季节性的气候变化经济成本估算。与近期研究显示Tvar对预期损失影响很小的结果相反,我们揭示忽略Svar会产生较大的向下偏差,因为升温在空间上高度异质。使用对损害函数的保守校准,我们表明此前的估算被向下偏差了约23-36%,这代表着在高排放情景下,到2050年额外损失约1.4万亿至2.3万亿美元,到本世纪末额外损失约17万亿至28万亿美元。2020-2100年期间损失的现值将比此前研究报告的数值高出47万亿至66万亿美元,约为2020年全球年度GDP的1/2至3/4。我们的结果表明,在IAMs中使用全球平均温度变化作为升温的汇总度量并不足以估算气候变化的成本。相反,IAMs应纳入对气候条件更完整的描述。

英文摘要:

Damage functions in integrated assessment models (IAMs) map changes in climate to economic impacts and form the basis for most of estimates of the social cost of carbon. Implicit in these functions lies an unwarranted assumption that restricts the spatial variation (Svar) and temporal variability (Tvar) of changes in climate to be null. This could bias damage estimates and the climate policy advice from IAMs. While the effects of Tvar have been studied in the literature, those of Svar and their interactions with Tvar have not. Here we present estimates of the economic costs of climate change that account for both Tvar and Svar, as well as for the seasonality of damages across sectors. Contrary to the results of recent studies which show little effect that of Tvar on expected losses, we reveal that ignoring Svar produces large downward biases, as warming is highly heterogeneous over space. Using a conservative calibration for the damage function, we show that previous estimates are biased downwards by about 23-36%, which represents additional losses of about US$1,400-US$2,300 billion by 2050 and US$17-US$28 trillion by the end of the century, under a high emissions scenario. The present value of losses during the period 2020-2100 would be larger than reported in previous studies by $47-$66 trillion or about 1/2 to 3/4 of annual global GDP in 2020. Our results imply that using global mean temperature change in IAMs as a summary measure of warming is not adequate for estimating the costs of climate change. Instead, IAMs should include a more complete description of climate conditions.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑