arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2209.04820math.AGmath.ACmath.CO
收藏

射影空间中点与投影的重叠

Configurations of points in projective space and their projections

Luca Chiantini, Łucja Farnik, Giuseppe Favacchio, Brian Harbourne, Juan Migliore, Tomasz Szemberg, Justyna Szpond

摘要:

我们称一个点集$Z\subset{\mathbb P}^{3}_{\mathbb C}$为$(a,b)$ -geproci集(因为广义投影是完全交),如果它从一个广义点$P$到一个平面的投影是次数为$a$和$b$的曲线的完全交。自2011年以来,我们称之为网格的例子已经众所周知。以前已知的唯一非网格非简并例子是$ab=12, 16, 20, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54$或$60$。在这里,对于任何$4 \leq a \leq b$,我们构造非网格非退化$(a,b)$ -geproci集在一个系统的方式。我们还表明,只有这样的例子与$a=3$是一个$(3,4)$ -geproci集来自$D_4$根系统,我们详细描述了$D_4$配置。我们还考虑问题的等价性(在各种意义上)的geproci集,以及哪些集发生在现实,而不能。我们确定了几个额外的例子geproci集有趣的属性。我们还探讨了意外锥和geproci集之间的关系,并介绍了$d$ -Weddle计划的概念所产生的特殊投影的有限点集。这项工作启动了对几何经典领域的新视角的探索。我们在最后一章中阐述和讨论了一系列悬而未决的问题。

英文摘要:

We call a set of points $Z\subset{\mathbb P}^{3}_{\mathbb C}$ an $(a,b)$-geproci set (for GEneral PROjection is a Complete Intersection) if its projection from a general point $P$ to a plane is a complete intersection of curves of degrees $a$ and $b$. Examples which we call grids have been known since 2011. The only nongrid nondegenerate examples previously known had $ab=12, 16, 20, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54$ or $60$. Here, for any $4 \leq a \leq b$, we construct nongrid nondegenerate $(a,b)$-geproci sets in a systematic way. We also show that the only such example with $a=3$ is a $(3,4)$-geproci set coming from the $D_4$ root system, and we describe the $D_4$ configuration in detail. We also consider the question of the equivalence (in various senses) of geproci sets, as well as which sets occur over the reals, and which cannot. We identify several additional examples of geproci sets with interesting properties. We also explore the relation between unexpected cones and geproci sets and introduce the notion of $d$-Weddle schemes arising from special projections of finite sets of points. This work initiates the exploration of new perspectives on classical areas of geometry. We formulate and discuss a range of open problems in the final chapter.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑