arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2003.00607quant-ph

量子态内纠缠与可分离性的内边界

Internal Boundary between Entanglement and Separability Within a Quantum State

Bang-Hai Wang

AI总结:

该研究提出量子态的纠缠/可分离性由态内阈值决定,引入最优可分离态概念,证明两体态可分解为最优纠缠态与最优可分离态的凸混合,并给出求解BSA等分解的可操作算法,解决了高维BSA计算的开放问题。

摘要:

量子态是量子力学中的核心数学对象,而纠缠是新兴的量子信息处理与量子计算领域的核心。然而,目前尚无通用的、充要的且可操作的可分离性条件来判定任意量子态是纠缠态还是可分离态。本文证明,量子态是否纠缠由该量子态内部的一个阈值决定。我们首先基于可分离态在更高层见证中作用的性质,引入“更优”和“最优”可分离态的概念。随后证明,任意两体量子态都可分解为其最优纠缠态和最优可分离态的凸混合。进一步地,我们表明任意量子态是纠缠还是可分离,以及是否具有正偏置转置(PPT)性质,都由其最优纠缠态相对于最优可分离态的鲁棒性参照一个关键阈值决定。此外,针对任意量子态,我们提供了可操作的算法来求解其最优纠缠态、最优可分离态、最佳可分离近似(BSA)分解以及最佳PPT近似分解,而高维系统中如何计算BSA此前是一个悬而未决的问题。

英文摘要:

Quantum states are the key mathematical objects in quantum mechanics, and entanglement lies at the heart of the nascent fields of quantum information processing and computation. However, there has not been a general, necessary and sufficient, and operational separability condition to determine whether an arbitrary quantum state is entangled or separable. In this paper, we show that whether a quantum state is entangled or not is determined by a threshold within the quantum state. We first introduce the concept of \emph{finer} and \emph{optimal} separable states based on the properties of separable states in the role of higher-level witnesses. Then we show that any bipartite quantum state can be decomposed into a convex mixture of its optimal entangled state and its optimal separable state. Furthermore, we show that whether an arbitrary quantum state is entangled or separable, as well as positive partial transposition (PPT) or not, is determined by the robustness of its optimal entangled state to its optimal separable state with reference to a crucial threshold. Moreover, for an arbitrary quantum state, we provide operational algorithms to obtain its optimal entangled state, its optimal separable state, its best separable approximation (BSA) decomposition, and its best PPT approximation decomposition while it was an open question that how to calculate the BSA in high-dimension systems.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑