我们将综合影响指标（I3）和h指数结合到I3型框架中，并引入出版向量X =（X1，X2，X3）和引用向量Y =（Y1，Y2，Y3），出版分数I3 X =X1+X2+X3和引用分数I3 Y =Y1+Y2+Y3，以及基于h指数生成的百分位数类别的替代指标。这些多元指标可用于学术评价。实证研究表明，h-核心分布适用于评价学者，X1和Y1适用于衡量高校核心影响力，I3 X和I3 Y可作为期刊影响因子（JIF）的替代。多元指标综合了h指数和I3的优点，为学术评价提供了一个多维视角。
英文摘要：
We combine the Integrated Impact Indicator (I3) and the h-index into the I3-type framework and introduce the publication vector X = (X1, X2, X3) and the citation vector Y = (Y1, Y2, Y3) , the publication score I3X=X1+X2+X3 and the citation score I3Y=Y1+Y2+Y3, and alternative indicators based on percentile classes generated by the h-index. These multivariate indicators can be used for academic evaluation. The empirical studies show that the h-core distribution is suitable to evaluate scholars, the X1 and Y1 are applied to measure core impact power of universities, and I3X and I3Y are alternatives of journal impact factor (JIF). The multivariate indicators provide a multidimensional view of academic evaluation with using the advantages of both the h-index and I3.
The academic performance indicators of the Doctor of Science title, the highest and most prestigious qualification awarded by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (HAS), are key in the national assessment system. The types of performance indicators, as well as their minimum values, are incorporated into the application requirements of academic promotions, scientific qualifications, and research scholarships. HAS has proposed a reform of these performance indicators, to align with the current national and global trends. The proposed modifications are generally based on arbitrary decisions and the …
In Hungary, the highest and most prestigious scientific qualification is considered to be the Doctor of Science (DSc) title being awarded by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. The academic performance indicators of the DSc title are of high importance in the evaluation of individuals' research performance not only when a researcher applies for obtaining a DSc title, but also during promotions and appointments at universities, and in the case of the evaluation of applications for scientific titles and degrees, and the assessment of applications for funding. In the Section of Earth Sciences enco…
There exist huge chunk of academic items receiving no citation years after years and remaining beyond the veil of ignorance of the academic audience. These are known as uncited items. Now, the question is, why a paper fails to get citation? The attribute of incapability of receiving citation may be termed as Uncitedness. This paper traces brief history of the concept of uncitedness sprouted first in 1964 in an article entitled Cybernetics, homeostasis and a model of disease by Gerson Jacobs. The concept of uncitedness was scientometrically first explained by Garfield in 1970. The uncitedness o…
The Distribution of the Asymptotic Number of Citations to Sets of Publications by a Researcher or From an Academic Department Are Consistent With a Discrete Lognormal Model
Metrics to evaluate research performance in academic institutions: A critique of ERA 2010 as applied in forestry and the indirect H2 index as a possible alternative
The main objective of this work is to analyse the contributions of Judit Bar-Ilan to the search engines studies. To do this, two complementary approaches have been carried out. First, a systematic literature review of 47 publications authored and co-authored by Judit and devoted to this topic. Second, an interdisciplinarity analysis based on the cited references (publications cited by Judit) and citing documents (publications that cite Judit's work) through Scopus. The systematic literature review unravels an immense amount of search engines studied (43) and indicators measured (especially tec…
The use of bibliometric indicators in research evaluation has a series of complex impacts on academic inquiry. These systems have gradually spread into a wide range of locations and disciplines, including the humanities. The aim of the present study is to examine their effects as perceived by philosophy researchers in Spain, a country where bibliometric indicators have long been used to evaluate research. The study combines data from a self-administered questionnaire completed by 201 researchers and from 14 in-depth interviews with researchers selected according to their affiliation, professio…
A critical cluster analysis of 44 indicators of author-level performance
本文探讨了作者级文献计量指标与研究者“测量”之间的关系，并以五个学术资历和四个学科为例。使用聚类方法，学科和资历适当的作者级指标进行检查。天文学、环境科学、哲学和公共卫生领域的741名研究人员的出版物和引文数据收集在Web of Science（WoS）中。使用这些数据计算了44项个人业绩指标。使用IBM SPSS第22版进行两步聚类分析，然后进行风险分析和有序逻辑回归以探索聚类成员。指标得分是根据研究人员个人的简历进行调整的。四个不同的集群的基础上的指标得分排名研究人员为低，中，高和极高的性能。结果表明，不同的指标是适当的划分在不同学科的排名性能。在天文学的h2指标，总pp顶道具在环境科学，Q2在哲学和电子指数在公共卫生。回归和比值分析显示，个体水平指标得分主要取决于研究人员首次在WoS中注册的年数，出版物数量和引用数量。资历分类是次要的，因此没有确定任何资历适当的指标。事实证明，如果初步数据准备充分，聚类方法在确定学科适当指标方面是有用的，但需要其他分析加以补充，以验证结果。研究人员在其简历上的表现与研究人员基于文献计量指标的表现之间存在普遍脱节。
Identifying important scholarly literature at an early stage is vital to the academic research community and other stakeholders such as technology companies and government bodies. Due to the sheer amount of research published and the growth of ever-changing interdisciplinary areas, researchers need an efficient way to identify important scholarly work. The number of citations a given research publication has accrued has been used for this purpose, but these take time to occur and longer to accumulate. In this article, we use altmetrics to predict the short-term and long-term citations that a s…
Which US and European Higher Education Institutions are visible in ResearchGate and what affects their RG Score?
虽然ResearchGate已经成为最受普通用户欢迎的学术社交网站，但并非所有机构都加入了该网站，而且该网站给学术机构和机构的评分也存在争议。本文评估了2017年欧洲和美国高等教育机构在ResearchGate中的存在，以及机构ResearchGate分数反映机构学术影响力的程度。样本中包括的2258所欧洲和4355所美国高等教育机构中的大多数都有机构ResearchGate简介，在Web of Science（WoS）中发现的博士学位授予机构几乎覆盖了所有机构。对于没有发表论文的非博士学位授予机构，规模（工作人员人数）与ResearchGate的存在最相关。对于WoS中的博士授予机构，RG中的存在与WoS出版物的数量密切相关。总之，a）机构RG分数反映的是研究量而不是知名度，b）该指标与WoS出版物的数量高度相关。因此，RG评分用于机构比较的价值有限。
Analysis of the Cuban journal Bibliotecas: Anales de Investigacion
本文旨在描述Bibliotecas的学术影响力、编辑过程质量以及编辑和可见性策略。Anales de Investigacion（BAI）是古巴国家图书馆何塞·马蒂编辑的古巴科学期刊。学术影响是通过引文分析确定的，该分析将Google Scholar数据库作为参考来源。所采用的文献计量学指标是：每年的引文、引文与自引、可引用期刊与不可引用文献、赫希指数和影响因子。编辑过程质量和可见性策略通过自我评估确定，其中考虑到SciELO，Scopus，CLASE，Redalyc，Latindex，Dialnet和ERIH PLUS方法。结果显示，引用线呈上升趋势，突出了图书馆和信息科学，医学和健康科学以及教育领域的引用期刊。内容和格式等方面对编辑过程质量产生了负面影响。提出了一些战略，通过纳入数据库，目录，社会和学术网络，以提高科学的知名度。总的来说，这项研究有助于编辑决策，一个问题，可以增加BAI的影响和科学知名度。
Bibliographic metrics are commonly utilized for evaluation purposes within academia, often in conjunction with other metrics. These metrics vary widely across fields and change with the seniority of the scholar; consequently, the only way to interpret these values is by comparison with other academics within the same field who are of similar seniority. Among the field- and time- normalized indicators, rank percentile has grown in popularity, and it is preferred over other types of indicators. In this paper, we propose and justify a novel rank percentile indicator for scholars. Furthermore, we …
