基于计量学的研究评价体系对西班牙哲学学术的影响：研究人员感知的分析
The footprint of a metrics-based research evaluation system on Spanish philosophical scholarship: an analysis of researchers perceptions
摘要：
文献计量学指标在科研评价中的运用对学术探究产生了一系列复杂的影响。这些系统已逐渐扩展到广泛的地点和学科，包括人文学科。本研究的目的是检查他们的影响，在西班牙，一个国家的文献计量学指标一直被用来评估研究的哲学研究人员认为。该研究结合了201名研究人员完成的自填问卷和14名根据其隶属关系，专业类别，性别和知识领域选择的研究人员进行的深入访谈的数据。结果表明，评价系统被广泛认为会影响研究行为的显着方式，特别是有关出版的做法（文件类型和出版语言），研究议程的转变和忽视教学工作，以及增加研究不端行为和心理健康的负面影响。其他成果包括提高研究生产力和加强学术遴选过程的透明度和公正性，但程度较轻。
英文摘要：
The use of bibliometric indicators in research evaluation has a series of complex impacts on academic inquiry. These systems have gradually spread into a wide range of locations and disciplines, including the humanities. The aim of the present study is to examine their effects as perceived by philosophy researchers in Spain, a country where bibliometric indicators have long been used to evaluate research. The study combines data from a self-administered questionnaire completed by 201 researchers and from 14 in-depth interviews with researchers selected according to their affiliation, professional category, gender and area of knowledge. Results show that the evaluation system is widely perceived to affect research behaviour in significant ways, particularly related to publication practices (document type and publication language), the transformation of research agendas and the neglect of teaching work, as well as increasing research misconduct and negatively affecting mental health. Although to a lesser extent, other consequences included increased research productivity and enhanced transparency and impartiality in academic selection processes.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
