arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1002.1364gr-qc
收藏

牛顿极限下标量-张量引力与f(R)-引力的比较

Comparing scalar-tensor gravity and f(R)-gravity in the Newtonian limit

S. Capozziello, A. Stabile, A. Troisi

摘要:

近年来,关于四阶引力模型的牛顿极限(即小速度和弱场)的争论一直很激烈。有些作者认为,$f(R)$ -引力的牛顿极限等价于Brans-Dicke引力与$ω_{BD} = 0$的牛顿极限,因而这些模型的PPN参数是不确定的。考虑到四阶引力模型与O 'Hanlon拉格朗日量在动力学上是等价的,本文对这一点进行了详细的讨论。这是标量-张量引力的一种特殊情况,其特征仅在于自相互作用势,在牛顿极限下,这意味着一种非标准行为,无法与广义相对论通常的PPN极限进行比较。这一结果与Brans-Dicke理论的结果完全不同,特别是表明用$ω_{BD} = 0$来考虑该理论的PPN参数以刻画$f(R)$ -引力的同调量是有误导性的。最后,在牛顿水平上的解决方案,在约旦框架中获得的$f(R)$ -引力,重新解释为标量张量理论,联系到那些在爱因斯坦框架。

英文摘要:

Recently, a strong debate has been pursued about the Newtonian limit (i.e. small velocity and weak field) of fourth order gravity models. According to some authors, the Newtonian limit of $f(R)$-gravity is equivalent to the one of Brans-Dicke gravity with $ω_{BD} = 0$, so that the PPN parameters of these models turn out to be ill defined. In this paper, we carefully discuss this point considering that fourth order gravity models are dynamically equivalent to the O'Hanlon Lagrangian. This is a special case of scalar-tensor gravity characterized only by self-interaction potential and that, in the Newtonian limit, this implies a non-standard behavior that cannot be compared with the usual PPN limit of General Relativity. The result turns out to be completely different from the one of Brans-Dicke theory and in particular suggests that it is misleading to consider the PPN parameters of this theory with $ω_{BD} = 0$ in order to characterize the homologous quantities of $f(R)$-gravity. Finally the solutions at Newtonian level, obtained in the Jordan frame for a $f(R)$-gravity, reinterpreted as a scalar-tensor theory, are linked to those in the Einstein frame.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑