arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.06115astro-ph.COastro-ph.GAgr-qchep-phhep-th
收藏

利用贝叶斯模型比较和张力量化评估标准宇宙学的一致性

Consistency of standard cosmologies using Bayesian model comparison and tension quantification

Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab(巴黎萨克雷大学);Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia(不列颠哥伦比亚大学物理与天文学系)

Lukas Tobias Hergt, Sophie Henrot-Versillé, Matthieu Tristram, Douglas Scott

AI总结:

本文通过贝叶斯方法评估LCDM模型的一致性,发现曲率张力和暗能量演变的证据依赖于数据组合和处理方式,但整体上标准宇宙模型仍具有一致性。

摘要:

我们提出了一个统一的贝叶斯评估,用于比较模型和数据集一致性,针对LCDM(冷暗物质加宇宙常数)及其最小扩展(中微子质量、空间曲率、常数或演变暗能量)模型,使用宇宙微波背景(CMB)、光子声学振荡(BAO)和Ia型超新星(SN)数据。主要结果总结在前三个图表中。我们用贝叶斯证据量化模型偏好,并用互补的证据和似然基于诊断方法,对数据集组合进行统一评估。对于所考虑的模型,更新的普朗克处理系统地提高了内部CMB一致性(低ℓ与高ℓ,以及初级CMB与CMB棱镜)。对于考虑的模型,封闭几何和与BAO和/或CMB棱镜相关的“曲率张力”主要局限于早期普朗克似然实现,并在使用更新的CMB处理和更近期的BAO测量时显著减弱。在CMB+BAO+SN组合中,似乎存在演变暗能量的证据,这取决于CMB和SN似然的特定配对:合理的替代方案会将推断的张力移位超过1σ,并可以完全逆转首选模型。允许自由中微子质量会吸收残余位移而不引入新不一致,我们未发现在考虑完整似然上下文后,存在独立的τ驱动不一致的稳健证据。我们得出结论,从LCDM到w0waCDM的必需模型更新的主张尚不成熟。

英文摘要:

We present a unified Bayesian assessment of model comparison and data-set consistency for LCDM (cold dark matter plus a cosmological constant) and minimal extensions (neutrino mass, spatial curvature, constant or evolving dark energy) using cosmic microwave background (CMB), baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO), and type Ia supernova (SN) data. The major results are summarized in the first three figures. We quantify model preference with Bayesian evidence and assess consistency with complementary evidence- and likelihood-based diagnostics applied uniformly across data-set combinations. For the models considered, updated Planck processing systematically improves internal CMB consistency (low-$\ell$ versus high-$\ell$, and primary CMB versus CMB lensing). The preference for a closed geometry and an associated ``curvature tension'' with BAO and/or CMB lensing are largely confined to earlier Planck likelihood implementations and weaken substantially when using updated CMB processing and more recent BAO measurements. Apparent evidence for evolving dark energy in CMB+BAO+SN combinations depends sensitively on the specific pairing of CMB and SN likelihoods: plausible alternatives shift inferred tensions by more than $1\,σ$ and can completely reverse the preferred model. Allowing a free neutrino mass tends to absorb residual shifts without introducing new inconsistencies, and we do not find robust evidence for a standalone $τ$-driven discrepancy once the full likelihood context is accounted for. We conclude that claims of a required update of our standard cosmological model from LCDM to $w_0w_a$CDM are premature.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑