arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2510.08044cs.ROcs.AI
收藏

面向可靠基于LLM的机器人规划:通过组合不确定性估计

Towards Reliable LLM-based Robot Planning via Combined Uncertainty Estimation

School of Artificial Intelligence, Henan University of Technology(河南工业大学人工智能学院);Institute of Artificial Intelligence (TeleAI), China Telecom(中国电信人工智能研究所)

Shiyuan Yin, Chenjia Bai, Zihao Zhang, Junwei Jin, Xinxin Zhang, Chi Zhang, Xuelong Li

AI总结:

本文提出CURE方法,通过分解认知与内在不确定性并细分认知不确定性,利用随机网络蒸馏和MLP回归头估计不确定性,在厨房操作和桌面重排实验中验证了其与实际执行结果更紧密的对齐。

摘要:

大型语言模型(LLMs)展示了高级推理能力,使机器人能够理解自然语言指令并生成具有适当基础的高层规划。然而,LLM幻觉构成了重大挑战,常常导致过度自信但可能不匹配或不安全的规划。尽管研究人员已探索不确定性估计以提高基于LLM规划的可信度,但现有研究尚未充分区分认知不确定性与内在不确定性,限制了不确定性估计的有效性。在本文中,我们提出了用于可靠具身规划的组合不确定性估计(CURE),该方法将不确定性分解为认知不确定性和内在不确定性,并分别进行估计。此外,认知不确定性被细分为任务清晰度和任务熟悉度,以实现更准确的评估。整体不确定性评估通过随机网络蒸馏和由LLM特征驱动的多层感知器回归头获得。我们在两种不同的实验设置中验证了我们的方法:厨房操作实验和桌面重排实验。结果表明,与现有方法相比,我们的方法产生的不确定性估计与实际执行结果更加紧密对齐。

英文摘要:

Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate advanced reasoning abilities, enabling robots to understand natural language instructions and generate high-level plans with appropriate grounding. However, LLM hallucinations present a significant challenge, often leading to overconfident yet potentially misaligned or unsafe plans. While researchers have explored uncertainty estimation to improve the reliability of LLM-based planning, existing studies have not sufficiently differentiated between epistemic and intrinsic uncertainty, limiting the effectiveness of uncertainty estimation. In this paper, we present Combined Uncertainty estimation for Reliable Embodied planning (CURE), which decomposes the uncertainty into epistemic and intrinsic uncertainty, each estimated separately. Furthermore, epistemic uncertainty is subdivided into task clarity and task familiarity for more accurate evaluation. The overall uncertainty assessments are obtained using random network distillation and multi-layer perceptron regression heads driven by LLM features. We validated our approach in two distinct experimental settings: kitchen manipulation and tabletop rearrangement experiments. The results show that, compared to existing methods, our approach yields uncertainty estimates that are more closely aligned with the actual execution outcomes.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑