arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2408.02480nucl-thphysics.data-an
收藏

无π有效场论中核子-核子散射数据的贝叶斯分析

Bayesian analysis of nucleon-nucleon scattering data in pionless effective field theory

J. M. Bub, M. Piarulli, R. J. Furnstahl, S. Pastore, D. R. Phillips

AI总结:

本文用贝叶斯方法校准无π EFT的两核子低能常数并估计截断误差,发现朴素量纲分析在NLO与N3LO给出不一致的破缺标度。

摘要:

我们对基于无π有效场论(EFT)的NN相互作用中出现的两核子(NN)低能常数(LECs)进行贝叶斯模型校准。该校准针对在NN相对动量(p)中采用朴素量纲分析构建的势展开至次领头阶[NLO,O(p²)]和次次次领头阶[N3LO,O(p⁴)]。我们考虑两类无π EFT势:一类作用于所有分波,另一类由s波物理主导。在对实验室能量最高至E_lab=5 MeV的NN数据进行校准时,两类势给出大致相似的结果。我们的分析考虑了无π EFT截断所产生的关联不确定性,同时估计EFT LECs和量化截断误差的参数。这使得首次能够对无π EFT的破缺标度Λ_b进行定量估计:95%区间在NLO为Λ_b∈[50.11,63.03] MeV,在N3LO为Λ_b∈[72.27,88.54] MeV。因此,对NN势采用朴素量纲分析并不能在无π EFT的各阶之间给出一致结果。这例证了贝叶斯工具可用于识别所提出的EFT幂次计数中的不一致性。

英文摘要:

We perform Bayesian model calibration of two-nucleon ($NN$) low-energy constants (LECs) appearing in an $NN$ interaction based on pionless effective field theory (EFT). The calibration is carried out for potentials constructed using naive dimensional analysis in $NN$ relative momenta ($p$) up to next-to-leading order [NLO, $O(p^2)$] and next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order [N3LO, $O(p^4)$]. We consider two classes of pionless EFT potential: one that acts in all partial waves and another that is dominated by $s$-wave physics. The two classes produce broadly similar results for calibrations to $NN$ data up to $E_{\rm lab}=5$ MeV. Our analysis accounts for the correlated uncertainties that arise from the truncation of the pionless EFT. We simultaneously estimate both the EFT LECs and the parameters that quantify the truncation error. This permits the first quantitative estimates of the pionless EFT breakdown scale, $Λ_b$: the 95% intervals are $Λ_b \in [50.11,63.03]$ MeV at NLO and $Λ_b \in [72.27, 88.54]$ MeV at N3LO. Invoking naive dimensional analysis for the $NN$ potential, therefore, does not lead to consistent results across orders in pionless EFT. This exemplifies the possible use of Bayesian tools to identify inconsistencies in a proposed EFT power counting.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑