arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2408.01443cs.CYcs.HC
收藏

生成式人工智能(GenAI)在教育中采用的框架

Framework for Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in Education

Samar Shailendra, Rajan Kadel, Aakanksha Sharma

AI总结:

针对大学课程采用GenAI缺乏指导的问题,提出涵盖利益相关者职责、课程重设计、师生赋能与评估矩阵的标准采用框架。

摘要:

贡献:提出一个将GenAI纳入大学课程的采用框架。该框架识别并强调了不同利益相关者(大学管理层、学生、教职员工等)在采用过程中的作用。它还提出了一种基于评估矩阵的客观方法,用于评估GenAI采用的成功程度和成果。背景:世界各地的大学都在讨论并艰难应对在课程中采用GenAI的问题。在行政部门和监管机构缺乏明确指导方针的情况下,教师和学生都不确定应采取何种方法。这需要一个既定框架来定义流程,并阐明所涉及的每个利益相关者的角色和责任。研究问题:学术生态系统是否需要一种将GenAI纳入其课程的方法?为学术人员提供一种系统方法,以确保在采用GenAI后能够实现学生的学习成果。如何在大学环境中衡量和传达GenAI的采用情况?方法:本研究采用的方法侧重于考察大学教育系统,并评估与在教学和学习中纳入GenAI相关的机遇和挑战。此外,它识别出阻碍GenAI在学术环境中有效整合的差距以及缺乏全面框架的问题。研究结果:文献调查结果表明,大学对GenAI的采用有限或根本没有采用,这进一步反映了不同利益相关者心中的困境。为成功采用GenAI,提出了一个标准框架:i)有效重新设计课程,ii)赋能教职员工和学生,iii)定义一个评估矩阵,以衡量采用过程的有效性和成功程度。

英文摘要:

Contributions: An adoption framework to include GenAI in the university curriculum. It identifies and highlights the role of different stakeholders (university management, students, staff, etc.) during the adoption process. It also proposes an objective approach based upon an evaluation matrix to assess the success and outcome of the GenAI adoption. Background: Universities worldwide are debating and struggling with the adoption of GenAI in their curriculum. Both the faculty and students are unsure about the approach in the absence of clear guidelines through the administration and regulators. This requires an established framework to define a process and articulate the roles and responsibilities of each stakeholder involved. Research Questions: Whether the academic ecosystem requires a methodology to adopt GenAI into its curriculum? A systematic approach for the academic staff to ensure the students' learning outcomes are met with the adoption of GenAI. How to measure and communicate the adoption of GenAI in the university setup? Methodology: The methodology employed in this study focuses on examining the university education system and assessing the opportunities and challenges related to incorporating GenAI in teaching and learning. Additionally, it identifies a gap and the absence of a comprehensive framework that obstructs the effective integration of GenAI within the academic environment. Findings: The literature survey results indicate the limited or no adoption of GenAI by the university, which further reflects the dilemma in the minds of different stakeholders. For the successful adoption of GenAI, a standard framework is proposed i) for effective redesign of the course curriculum, ii) for enabling staff and students, iii) to define an evaluation matrix to measure the effectiveness and success of the adoption process.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑