arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2402.04767astro-ph.COgr-qchep-phhep-th
收藏

ΛCDM 张力:通过一致性检验定位缺失的物理

$Λ$CDM Tensions: Localising Missing Physics through Consistency Checks

Özgür Akarsu, Eoin Ó Colgáin, Anjan A. Sen, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari

AI总结:

本文提出通过红移和尺度上的一致性检验来定位 ΛCDM 模型中缺失的物理,重点利用依赖红移的拟合参数识别问题,并展示了该方法在 S8 和 H0 张力上的应用,指出这些张力暗示背景 ΛCDM 宇宙学存在缺陷。

摘要:

ΛCDM 张力从定义上就是模型依赖的;人们是通过 ΛCDM 的棱镜看到异常现象的。因此,朝着解决张力的方向推进,必须检验 ΛCDM 模型的一致性,以便在红移或尺度上定位缺失的物理。由于宇宙是动态的,红移是时间的代理,因此必须首先进行涉及红移的一致性检验,然后再进行涉及尺度的一致性检验,以此作为解决“系统误差与新物理”之争并促进有依据的模型构建的后续步骤。我们对支撑 ΛCDM 宇宙学模型的假设层级进行了综述,并评论了放宽这些假设是否能解决这些张力。我们重点关注通过识别依赖红移的 ΛCDM 模型拟合参数来定位缺失物理这一最容易实现的目标。我们强调了近期在 ${S_8:= σ_8 \sqrt{Ω_{\rm m}/0.3}}$ 张力上取得的进展,并阐明了如何在 $H_0$ 张力上取得类似进展。我们的讨论表明,$H_0$ 张力,等价于依赖红移的 $H_0$,以及依赖红移的 $S_8$,意味着背景 ΛCDM 宇宙学存在问题。

英文摘要:

$Λ$CDM tensions are by definition model dependent; one sees anomalies through the prism of $Λ$CDM. Thus, progress towards tension resolution necessitates checking the consistency of the $Λ$CDM model to localise missing physics either in redshift or scale. Since the Universe is dynamical and redshift is a proxy for time, it is imperative to first perform consistency checks involving redshift, then consistency checks involving scale, as the next steps to settle the ``systematics versus new physics" debate and foster informed model building. We present a review of the hierarchy of assumptions underlying the $Λ$CDM cosmological model and comment on whether relaxing them can address the tensions. We focus on the lowest lying fruit of identifying missing physics through the identification of redshift dependent $Λ$CDM model fitting parameters. We highlight recent progress made on ${S_8:= σ_8 \sqrt{Ω_{\rm m}/0.3}}$ tension and elucidate how similar progress can be made on $H_0$ tension. Our discussions indicate that $H_0$ tension, equivalently a redshift dependent $H_0$, and a redshift dependent $S_8$ imply a problem with background $Λ$CDM cosmology.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑