arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1907.07569astro-ph.COgr-qchep-ph
收藏

从$H_0$张力看新物理学:另一种观点

New physics in light of the $H_0$ tension: an alternative view

Sunny Vagnozzi

摘要:

哈勃常数$H_0$的局部和逆距离阶梯估计之间的强烈差异可能指向$Λ$ CDM之外的新物理学。通过新物理学解决这种紧张关系的几种尝试依赖于扩展模型,其特征在于6个$Λ$ CDM参数之外的额外自由参数。然而,对额外参数的边缘化具有扩大推断参数的不确定性的效果,并且通常情况下,在这些模型中,由于更大的不确定性而不是$H_0$的中心值的真正偏移,解决了$H_0$张力。如果一个物理理论能够将额外的参数固定在一组特定的非标准值上,会发生什么?模型的自由度相对于额外参数自由变化的标准情况减少。聚焦于暗能量状态方程$w$和相对论性物种的有效数$N_{\rm eff}$,我发现,能够固定$w \approx -1.3$或$N_{\rm eff} \approx 3.95$的物理理论将导致从CMB,BAO和SNeIa数据的估计$H_0$与本地距离阶梯估计完全一致,而不会扩大其不确定性。从模型选择的角度来看,这两个非标准模型相对于$Λ$ CDM非常不利。然而,预测$N_{\rm eff} \approx 3.45$的模型将能够使张力降低到$1.5σ$,同时相对于$Λ$ CDM仅略微不利,而预测$w \approx -1.1$的模型将能够使张力降低到$2σ$(以明确偏好$Λ$ CDM为代价)。最后,我估计无量纲乘数有关$H_0$的变化$w$和$N_{\rm eff}$,这可以用来重复本文的分析,在未来更精确的本地距离阶梯估计$H_0$的变化。

英文摘要:

The strong discrepancy between local and inverse distance ladder estimates of the Hubble constant $H_0$ could be pointing towards new physics beyond $Λ$CDM. Several attempts to address this tension through new physics rely on extended models, featuring extra free parameters beyond the 6 $Λ$CDM parameters. However, marginalizing over extra parameters has the effect of broadening the uncertainties on the inferred parameters, and it is often the case that within these models the $H_0$ tension is addressed due to larger uncertainties rather than a genuine shift in the central value of $H_0$. What happens if a physical theory is able to fix the extra parameters to a specific set of non-standard values? The degrees of freedom of the model are reduced with respect to the standard case where the extra parameters are free to vary. Focusing on the dark energy equation of state $w$ and the effective number of relativistic species $N_{\rm eff}$, I find that physical theories able to fix $w \approx -1.3$ or $N_{\rm eff} \approx 3.95$ would lead to an estimate of $H_0$ from CMB, BAO, and SNeIa data in perfect agreement with the local distance ladder estimate, without broadening its uncertainty. These two non-standard models are, from a model-selection perspective, strongly disfavoured with respect to $Λ$CDM. However, models that predict $N_{\rm eff} \approx 3.45$ would be able to bring the tension down to $1.5σ$ while only being weakly disfavored with respect to $Λ$CDM, whereas models that predict $w \approx -1.1$ would be able to bring the tension down to $2σ$ (at the cost of the preference for $Λ$CDM being definite). Finally, I estimate dimensionless multipliers relating variations in $H_0$ to variations in $w$ and $N_{\rm eff}$, which can be used to repeat the analysis of this paper in light of future more precise local distance ladder estimates of $H_0$.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑