arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2301.01092math.APphysics.flu-dyn
收藏

轴对称涡环的消失粘性极限

Vanishing viscosity limit for axisymmetric vortex rings

Thierry Gallay, Vladimir Sverak

AI总结:

本文研究了 $R^3$ 中低粘性不可压缩 Navier-Stokes 方程的 Cauchy 问题,证明了在小粘性下圆形涡丝解可由热方程解与 Kelvin 公式速度近似,从而严格论证了弱粘性流体中涡丝的双法向运动,并利用 Arnold 几何稳定性方法验证了近似解的稳定性。

摘要:

对于 $R^3$ 中具有低粘性 $ν>0$ 的不可压缩 Navier-Stokes 方程,我们考虑如下 Cauchy 问题:其初始涡度 $ω_0$ 表示支撑在一个圆上、强度为任意给定值 $Γ$ 的无限细涡丝。解的涡度场 $ω(x,t)$ 在任意正时刻都是光滑的,对应于厚度为 $\sqrt{νt}$ 的涡环,该涡环由于自感应而沿其对称轴平移,这一效应由 Helmholtz 于 1858 年预见,并由 Kelvin 于 1867 年量化。对于小粘性,我们证明在一个大时间区间内,$ω(x,t)$ 能被 $ω_{lin}(x-a(t),t)$ 很好地近似,其中 $ω_{lin}(\cdot,t)=\exp(νtΔ)ω_0$ 是以 $ω_0$ 为初始数据的热方程的解,而 $\dot a(t)$ 是由 Kelvin 公式给出的瞬时速度。这为弱粘性流体中圆形涡丝的双法向运动提供了严格的证明。证明依赖于构造一个精确的近似解,使用了在自相似变量中的微扰展开。为了验证该近似的稳定性,需要排除来自线性化算子中极大平流项的潜在不稳定性。这是通过将 V. I. Arnold 在无粘情况 $ν=0$ 下发展的几何稳定性方法,调整适用于微粘性情况来完成的。结果表明,尽管 Arnold 方法背后的几何结构不再被 $ν> 0$ 时的方程所保持,但相关的二次型在比 Arnold 理论最初使用的更大的子空间上表现良好,并与粘性项产生有利的相互作用。

英文摘要:

For the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in $R^3$ with low viscosity $ν>0$, we consider the Cauchy problem with initial vorticity $ω_0$ that represents an infinitely thin vortex filament of arbitrary given strength $Γ$ supported on a circle. The vorticity field $ω(x,t)$ of the solution is smooth at any positive time and corresponds to a vortex ring of thickness $\sqrt{νt}$ that is translated along its symmetry axis due to self-induction, an effect anticipated by Helmholtz in 1858 and quantified by Kelvin in 1867. For small viscosities, we show that $ω(x,t)$ is well-approximated on a large time interval by $ω_{lin}(x-a(t),t)$, where $ω_{lin}(\cdot,t)=\exp(νtΔ)ω_0$ is the solution of the heat equation with initial data $ω_0$, and $\dot a(t)$ is the instantaneous velocity given by Kelvin's formula. This gives a rigorous justification of the binormal motion for circular vortex filaments in weakly viscous fluids. The proof relies on the construction of a precise approximate solution, using a perturbative expansion in self-similar variables. To verify the stability of this approximation, one needs to rule out potential instabilities coming from very large advection terms in the linearized operator. This is done by adapting V. I. Arnold's geometric stability methods developed in the inviscid case $ν=0$ to the slightly viscous situation. It turns out that although the geometric structures behind Arnold's approach are no longer preserved by the equation for $ν> 0$, the relevant quadratic forms behave well on larger subspaces than those originally used in Arnold's theory and interact favorably with the viscous terms.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑