arXiv 2109.022462021-09astro-ph.SR

快速振荡的{ \it TESS } A-F主序星：roAp是一个独特的类吗？

Rapidly-oscillating {\it TESS} A--F main sequence stars: are the roAp stars a distinct class?

L. A. Balona

备注：: 19 pages, 11 figures, 5 tables
DOI：: 10.1093/mnras/stac011

摘要：

从扇区1- 44 { \em TESS}观测，19个新的roAp星，发现了103颗具有类roAp频率的表面非奇特星和617颗具有roAp典型独立频率的$δ$ ~Scuti星，通过对所有化学奇特星的{ \em TESS}检验，发现了199颗Ap星，它们的脉动频率为$δ$ ~Sct或$γ$ ~多尔变量。脉动Ap星的比例与脉动化学正常星的比例相同。化学奇特的$δ$ ~Sct星和roAp星在频率和径向序上没有明显的区别。事实上，过去将roAp与$δ$ ~Sct星区分开来的所有特征都消失了。没有理由假设roAp星的高频率是由与化学正常的恒星不同的机制驱动的。然而，化学性质特殊的恒星更有可能以高频率脉动。“roAp”这个词应该去掉：所有的roAp星都是正常的$δ$ ~Scuti星。

英文摘要：

From sector 1--44 {\em TESS} observations, 19 new roAp stars, 103 ostensibly non-peculiar stars with roAp-like frequencies and 617 $δ$~Scuti stars with independent frequencies typical of roAp stars were found. Examination of all chemically peculiar stars observed by {\em TESS} resulted in the discovery of 199 Ap stars which pulsate as $δ$~Sct or $γ$~Dor variables. The fraction of pulsating Ap stars is the same as the fraction of pulsating chemically normal stars. There is no distinct separation in frequency or radial order between chemically peculiar $δ$~Sct stars and roAp stars. In fact, all the features which originally distinguished roAp from $δ$~Sct stars in the past have disappeared. There is no reason to assume that the high frequencies in roAp stars are driven by a different mechanism from the high frequencies in chemically normal stars. However, chemically peculiar stars are far more likely to pulsate with high frequencies. The term "roAp" should be dropped: all roAp stars are normal $δ$~Scuti stars.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。

摘要：

英文摘要：

相关论文