arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2003.14349gr-qc
收藏

带电旋转黑洞的阴影:Kerr-Newman与Kerr-Sen

Shadows of charged rotating black holes: Kerr-Newman versus Kerr-Sen

Sérgio Vinicius M. C. B. Xavier, Pedro V. P. Cunha, Luís C. B. Crispino, Carlos A. R. Herdeiro

摘要:

在庆祝其第一次实验测试一百周年之际,广义相对论(GR)成功地并始终如一地通过了随后的所有测试。然而,在某些尺度上,新的物理学,特别是以量子修正的形式,将会出现,改变GR的一些预测,这是一个经典理论。在这方面,黑洞(BH)是探索强引力场量子效应的天然构型。杂化弦论是描述量子引力的主要候选理论之一,其低能有效场论描述下的BH解是近三十年来众多研究的焦点。在事件视界望远镜观测之后,最近对BH强引力透镜的兴趣表明,为了评估这些模型之间的现象学差异,可以比较GR和杂化弦论中的BH透镜。在这项工作中,我们调查的阴影的两个带电BH的解决方案与旋转的差异:一个产生的背景下的GR,即克尔-纽曼解决方案,和其他的背景下的低能杂波弦论,克尔-森解决方案。我们显示和解释,特别是,弦BH总是有一个更大的阴影,相同的物理参数和观测条件。

英文摘要:

Celebrating the centennial of its first experimental test, the theory of General Relativity (GR) has successfully and consistently passed all subsequent tests with flying colours. It is expected, however, that at certain scales new physics, in particular in the form of quantum corrections, will emerge, changing some of the predictions of GR, which is a classical theory. In this respect, black holes (BHs) are natural configurations to explore the quantum effects on strong gravitational fields. BH solutions in the low-energy effective field theory description of the heterotic string theory, which is one of the leading candidates to describe quantum gravity, have been the focus of many studies in the last three decades. The recent interest in strong gravitational lensing by BHs, in the wake of the Event Horizon Telescope observations, suggests comparing the BH lensing in both GR and heterotic string theory, in order to assess the phenomenological differences between these models. In this work, we investigate the differences in the shadows of two charged BH solutions with rotation: one arising in the context of GR, namely the Kerr-Newman solution, and the other within the context of low-energy heterotic string theory, the Kerr-Sen solution. We show and interpret, in particular, that the stringy BH always has a larger shadow, for the same physical parameters and observation conditions.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑