arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2003.13231math.DG
收藏

尖锐特征值估计及相关刚性定理

Sharp eigenvalue estimates and related rigidity theorems

Yanlin Deng, Feng Du, Jing Mao, Yan Zhao

AI总结:

本文利用体积与特征值比较及推广的Reilly公式,分别建立Wentzell与漂移Steklov第一非零特征值的尖锐界,并证明等号情形对应等距测地球或Euclidean球的刚性。

摘要:

本文得到了不同类型的第一非零特征值的尖锐界。此外,当这些界达到时,可以刻画相关的刚性。更具体地说,首先,通过应用文献[10,13]中证明的Bishop型体积比较以及文献[26]中证明的关于Laplacian第一非零Steklov特征值的Escobar型特征值比较,对于具有径向截面曲率上界的流形,在适当的前提条件下,我们可以证明这些流形上测地球的第一非零Wentzell特征值,可以由由曲率界确定的模型空间(即球对称流形)中相同半径测地球的相应特征值给出上界。此外,该第一非零Wentzell特征值上界达到,当且仅当这两个测地球彼此等距。该结论可视为文献[9,26]中特征值比较的推广。其次,我们证明了漂移Laplacian的一般Reilly公式,随后利用该公式,在具有边界和凸势函数的紧光滑度量测度空间上,给出了漂移Laplacian第一非零Steklov特征值的尖锐下界。此外,该下界仅在给定半径的Euclidean球上达到。

英文摘要:

In this paper, sharp bounds for the first nonzero eigenvalues of different type have been obtained. Moreover, when those bounds are achieved, related rigidities can be characterized. More precisely, first, by applying the Bishop-type volume comparison proven in [10,13] and the Escobar-type eigenvalue comparisons for the first nonzero Steklov eigenvalue of the Laplacian proven in [26], for manifolds with radial sectional curvature upper bound, under suitable preconditions, we can show that the first nonzero Wentzell eigenvalue of the geodesic ball on these manifolds can be bounded from above by that of the geodesic ball with the same radius in the model space (i.e., spherically symmetric manifolds) determined by the curvature bound. Besides, this upper bound for the first nonzero Wentzell eigenvalue can be achieved if and only if these two geodesic balls are isometric with each other. This conclusion can be seen as an extension of eigenvalue comparisons in [9,26]. Second, we prove a general Reilly formula for the drifting Laplacian, and then use the formula to give a sharp lower bound for the first nonzero Steklov eigenvalue of the drifting Laplacian on compact smooth metric measure spaces with boundary and convex potential function. Besides, this lower bound can be achieved only for the Euclidean ball of the prescribed radius.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑