arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1912.01596hep-phhep-th
收藏

全息QCD中的轴矢量跃迁形状因子及其对缪子反常磁矩的贡献

Axial vector transition form factors in holographic QCD and their contribution to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon

Josef Leutgeb, Anton Rebhan

AI总结:

本文在全息QCD模型中计算轴矢量跃迁形状因子,发现其与L3数据吻合,但双虚结果偏离偶极形式,导致缪子反常磁矩的轴矢量贡献显著,硬壁模型满足短距离约束时数值为(2.9-4.1)×10^-10,重缩放后仍大于多数唯象估计。

摘要:

我们在全息QCD模型中评估了轴矢量跃迁形状因子,这些模型已被证明能很好地重现近期关于π介子跃迁形状因子的实验和理论结果。与L3关于$f_1\ oγγ^*$的数据比较,我们发现单虚形状因子的形状具有显著的一致性。在双虚情形下,全息结果与简单的偶极形式差异很大,这对通过强子光-光散射对缪子反常磁矩$a_μ$的轴矢量贡献的相应估计有重要影响。我们证明,硬壁模型满足Melnikov-Vainshtein短距离约束,当且仅当包含无穷的轴矢量态塔时。然而,$a_μ$的结果主要由前几个共振态主导。数值上,这些结果出乎意料地大:在硬壁模型中为(2.9 - 4.1)$\ imes 10^{-10}$,其中57-58%来自纵向贡献,该贡献正是负责Melnikov-Vainshtein短距离约束的部分。重新缩放全息结果以获得L3数据的最优拟合,但仅匹配渐近约束的52%,结果降至$2.2(5)\ imes 10^{-10}$,这仍然显著大于大多数先前对轴矢量交换贡献的唯象学估计。

英文摘要:

We evaluate axial vector transition form factors in holographic QCD models that have been shown to reproduce well recent experimental and theoretical results for the pion transition form factor. Comparing with L3 data on $f_1\toγγ^*$ we find remarkable agreement regarding the shape of single-virtual form factors. In the double-virtual case, the holographic results differ strongly from a simple dipole form, and this has an important impact on the corresponding estimate of the axial vector contribution to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon $a_μ$ through hadronic light-by-light scattering. We demonstrate that hard-wall models satisfy the Melnikov-Vainshtein short-distance constraint for the latter, if and only if the infinite tower of axial vector states is included. The results for $a_μ$, however, are strongly dominated by the first few resonances. Numerically, these results turn out to be surprisingly large: (2.9 - 4.1)$\times 10^{-10}$ in the hard-wall models, 57-58% of which are due to the longitudinal contribution, which is the one responsible for the Melnikov-Vainshtein short-distance constraint. Rescaling the holographic result to obtain an optimal fit of L3 data, but then matching only 52% of the asymptotic constraint, the result is reduced to $2.2(5)\times 10^{-10}$, which is still significantly larger than most previous phenomenological estimates of the axial vector exchange contribution.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑