This paper is an axiomatic study of consistent approval-based multi-winner rules, i.e., voting rules that select a fixed-size group of candidates based on approval ballots. We introduce the class of counting rules and provide an axiomatic characterization of this class based on the consistency axiom. Building upon this result, we axiomatically characterize three important consistent multi-winner rules: Proportional Approval Voting, Multi-Winner Approval Voting and the Approval Chamberlin--Courant rule. Our results demonstrate the variety of multi-winner rules and illustrate three different, orthogonal principles that multi-winner voting rules may represent: individual excellence, diversity, and proportionality.
Tulane University（杜兰大学）；Louisiana State University（路易斯安那州立大学）；University of West Florida（西佛罗里达大学）；Institute for Human and Machine Cognition（人机认知研究所）
In many real world situations, collective decisions are made using voting and, in scenarios such as committee or board elections, employing voting rules that return multiple winners. In multi-winner approval voting (AV), an agent submits a ballot consisting of approvals for as many candidates as they wish, and winners are chosen by tallying up the votes and choosing the top-$k$ candidates receiving the most approvals. In many scenarios, an agent may manipulate the ballot they submit in order to achieve a better outcome by voting in a way that does not reflect their true preferences. In complex…
Epistemic voting interprets votes as noisy signals about a ground truth. We consider contexts where the truth consists of a set of objective winners, knowing a lower and upper bound on its cardinality. A prototypical problem for this setting is the aggre-gation of multi-label annotations with prior knowledge on the size of the ground truth. We posit noisemodels, for which we define rules that output an optimal set of winners. We report on experiments on multi-label annotations (which we collected).
Multi-winner voting is the process of selecting a fixed-size set of representative candidates based on voters' preferences. It occurs in applications ranging from politics (parliamentary elections) to the design of modern computer applications (collaborative filtering, dynamic Q&A platforms, diversifying search results). All these applications share the problem of identifying a representative subset of alternatives -- and the study of multi-winner voting is the principled analysis of this task. This book provides a thorough and in-depth look at multi-winner voting based on approval preferences…
Proportional Approval Method using Squared loads, Approval removal and Coin-flip approval transformation (PAMSAC) - a new system of proportional representation using approval voting
How long is a piece of string? An exploration of multi-winner approval voting and ballot-length restrictions
从学术团体和协会到公共选举，在各种场合都可以看到多赢家批准选举。在这类选举中，往往实行选票长度限制;也就是说，选民对他们可以投票选举的候选人人数有限制。尽管有这一共同特征，但选票长度限制似乎没有任何理论依据（Laslier和Van der Straeten，2016）。这项工作内生地得出了一套选民最佳反应选票长度在完全信息和选民效用和投票规则的一般假设。这些结果为实践中观察到的一些选票长度限制提供了理由，但是当考虑均衡结果时，我们的分析表明这种理由不再有效。均衡分析被认为是懒惰和真理偏见的二阶倾向的选民和均衡解决方案的概念是纯粹的纳什均衡。关键的见解表明，选票长度的限制或制度的特点，使投票成本可能会导致不稳定的选举结果时，选民有不同的偏好，通过不存在的均衡。另一方面，当均衡确实存在时，它们满足理想的性质，而这些性质是在无成本投票和没有投票长度限制的情况下获得的均衡所不能保证的。总之，我们的研究结果突出了稳定和理想的选举结果之间的鲜明权衡。
We define a family of runoff rules that work as follows: voters cast approval ballots over candidates; two finalists are selected; and the winner is decided by majority. With approval-type ballots, there are various ways to select the finalists. We leverage known approval-based committee rules and study the obtained runoff rules from an axiomatic point of view. Then we analyze the outcome of these rules on single-peaked profiles, and on real data.
Participatory budgeting (PB) is a democratic paradigm whereby voters decide on a set of projects to fund with a limited budget. We consider PB in a setting where voters report ordinal preferences over projects and have (possibly) asymmetric weights. We propose proportional representation axioms and clarify how they fit into other preference aggregation settings, such as multi-winner voting and approval-based multi-winner voting. As a result of our study, we also discover a new solution concept for approval-based multi-winner voting, which we call Inclusion PSC (IPSC). IPSC is stronger than pro…
On the Complexity of Winner Determination and Strategic Control in Conditional Approval Voting
Athens University of Economics and Business（雅典经济与商业大学）；Archimedes, Athena Research Center（阿基米德、雅典研究中心）；Input Output Global (IOG)（输入输出全球（IOG））；University of Warsaw（华沙大学）
Technische Universität Berlin（柏林工业大学）；Paris School of Economics（巴黎经济学院）；University of Warsaw（华沙大学）
We establish a link between multiwinner elections and apportionment problems by showing how approval-based multiwinner election rules can be interpreted as methods of apportionment. We consider several multiwinner rules and observe that they induce apportionment methods that are well-established in the literature on proportional representation. For instance, we show that Proportional Approval Voting induces the D'Hondt method and that Monroe's rule induces the largest reminder method. We also consider properties of apportionment methods and exhibit multiwinner rules that induce apportionment m…
Epistemic social choice aims at unveiling a hidden ground truth given votes, which are interpreted as noisy signals about it. We consider here a simple setting where votes consist of approval ballots: each voter approves a set of alternatives which they believe can possibly be the ground truth. Based on the intuitive idea that more reliable votes contain fewer alternatives, we define several noise models that are approval voting variants of the Mallows model. The likelihood-maximizing alternative is then characterized as the winner of a weighted approval rule, where the weight of a ballot decr…
We study the robustness of GreedyCC, GreedyPAV, and Phargmen's sequential rule, using the framework introduced by Bredereck et al. for the case of (multiwinner) ordinal elections and adopted to the approval setting by Gawron and Faliszewski. First, we show that for each of our rules and every committee size $k$, there are elections in which adding or removing a certain approval causes the winning committee to completely change (i.e., the winning committee after the operation is disjoint from the one before the operation). Second, we show that the problem of deciding how many approvals need to …
Approval-based committee (ABC) voting rules elect a fixed size subset of the candidates, a so-called committee, based on the voters' approval ballots over the candidates. While these rules have recently attracted significant attention, axiomatic characterizations are largely missing so far. We address this problem by characterizing ABC voting rules within the broad and intuitive class of sequential valuation rules. These rules compute the winning committees by sequentially adding candidates that increase the score of the chosen committee the most. In more detail, we first characterize almost t…
AGH University（AGH大学）；TU Berlin（柏林工业大学）；Weizmann Institute of Science（魏茨曼科学研究所）
We study the problem of bribery in multiwinner elections, for the case where the voters cast approval ballots (i.e., sets of candidates they approve) and the bribery actions are limited to: adding an approval to a vote, deleting an approval from a vote, or moving an approval within a vote from one candidate to the other. We consider a number of approval-based multiwinner rules (AV, SAV, GAV, RAV, approval-based Chamberlin--Courant, and PAV). We find the landscape of complexity results quite rich, going from polynomial-time algorithms through NP-hardness with constant-factor approximations, to …
Answering an open question by Betzler et al. [Betzler et al., JAIR'13], we resolve the parameterized complexity of the multi-winner determination problem under two famous representation voting rules: the Chamberlin-Courant (in short CC) rule [Chamberlin and Courant, APSR'83] and the Monroe rule [Monroe, APSR'95]. We show that under both rules, the problem is W[1]-hard with respect to the sum $β$ of misrepresentations, thereby precluding the existence of any $f(β) \cdot |I|^{O(1)}$ -time algorithm, where $|I|$ denotes the size of the input instance.
Aarhus University（奥胡斯大学）；Computer Technology Institute “Diophantus”（“丢番图”计算机技术研究所）；University of Patras（帕特雷大学）
Approval-based multiwinner voting rules have recently received much attention in the Computational Social Choice literature. Such rules aggregate approval ballots and determine a winning committee of alternatives. To assess effectiveness, we propose to employ new noise models that are specifically tailored for approval votes and committees. These models take as input a ground truth committee and return random approval votes to be thought of as noisy estimates of the ground truth. A minimum robustness requirement for an approval-based multiwinner voting rule is to return the ground truth when a…
In party-approval multiwinner elections the goal is to allocate the seats of a fixed-size committee to parties based on the approval ballots of the voters over the parties. In particular, each voter can approve multiple parties and each party can be assigned multiple seats. Two central requirements in this setting are proportional representation and strategyproofness. Intuitively, proportional representation requires that every sufficiently large group of voters with similar preferences is represented in the committee. Strategyproofness demands that no voter can benefit by misreporting her tru…
