arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1401.3876cs.GTcs.MA
收藏

偏序条件下确定可能和必要获胜者

Determining Possible and Necessary Winners Given Partial Orders

Lirong Xia, Vincent Conitzer

摘要:

通常,投票规则要求代理人以线性顺序给出他们的偏好。然而,在某些情况下,它是不切实际的代理给所有的替代品的线性顺序。有人建议让代理商提交部分订单。然后,给定一个投票规则,一个偏序的轮廓,和一个备选(候选)c,两个重要的问题出现了:第一,c仍然有可能获胜吗?第二,c保证获胜吗?这些分别是可能的赢家和必要的赢家问题。这两个问题中的每一个都进一步分为两个子问题:确定c是否是唯一的赢家(即c是唯一的赢家),或者确定c是否是共同赢家(即c是赢家集合中的赢家)。我们考虑的设置中的选项的数量是无限的,投票是unweighted。我们完全描述了以下常见的投票规则的复杂性的可能/必要的赢家问题:一类的位置评分规则(包括Borda),科普兰,最大,Bucklin,排名对,投票树,和多径流。

英文摘要:

Usually a voting rule requires agents to give their preferences as linear orders. However, in some cases it is impractical for an agent to give a linear order over all the alternatives. It has been suggested to let agents submit partial orders instead. Then, given a voting rule, a profile of partial orders, and an alternative (candidate) c, two important questions arise: first, is it still possible for c to win, and second, is c guaranteed to win? These are the possible winner and necessary winner problems, respectively. Each of these two problems is further divided into two sub-problems: determining whether c is a unique winner (that is, c is the only winner), or determining whether c is a co-winner (that is, c is in the set of winners). We consider the setting where the number of alternatives is unbounded and the votes are unweighted. We completely characterize the complexity of possible/necessary winner problems for the following common voting rules: a class of positional scoring rules (including Borda), Copeland, maximin, Bucklin, ranked pairs, voting trees, and plurality with runoff.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑