arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1504.04136cs.FL
收藏

概率密封自动机的值1判定问题

Deciding the value 1 problem for probabilistic leaktight automata

Nathanaël Fijalkow, Hugo Gimbert, Edon Kelmendi, Youssouf Oualhadj

摘要:

值1问题是一个概率自动机在有限词上的决策问题:给定一个概率自动机,是否有概率任意接近1的词被接受?这个问题最近被证明是不可判定的;为了克服这个问题,提出了几类不同性质的概率自动机,其中值1问题已被证明是可判定的。在本文中,我们介绍了另一类概率自动机,称为leaktight自动机,它严格包含所有类的概率自动机的值1的问题是已知的可判定的。我们证明,对于密封自动机,值1的问题是可判定的(事实上,PSPACE完全)通过构建一个饱和算法的基础上计算的幺半群抽象的自动机的行为。我们依靠西蒙开发的代数技术来证明这种抽象是完整的。此外,我们适应这种饱和算法来决定是否一个自动机是密封的。最后,我们展示了一个减少,允许我们的可判定性结果从有限字到无限的,这意味着值1的问题的概率leaktight奇偶自动机是可判定的。

英文摘要:

The value 1 problem is a decision problem for probabilistic automata over finite words: given a probabilistic automaton, are there words accepted with probability arbitrarily close to 1? This problem was proved undecidable recently; to overcome this, several classes of probabilistic automata of different nature were proposed, for which the value 1 problem has been shown decidable. In this paper, we introduce yet another class of probabilistic automata, called leaktight automata, which strictly subsumes all classes of probabilistic automata whose value 1 problem is known to be decidable. We prove that for leaktight automata, the value 1 problem is decidable (in fact, PSPACE-complete) by constructing a saturation algorithm based on the computation of a monoid abstracting the behaviours of the automaton. We rely on algebraic techniques developed by Simon to prove that this abstraction is complete. Furthermore, we adapt this saturation algorithm to decide whether an automaton is leaktight. Finally, we show a reduction allowing to extend our decidability results from finite words to infinite ones, implying that the value 1 problem for probabilistic leaktight parity automata is decidable.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑