arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1409.2139cs.DS
收藏

具有可分解权值的在线二分匹配

Online Bipartite Matching with Decomposable Weights

Moses Charikar, Monika Henzinger, Huy L. Nguyen

摘要:

本文研究了一个带权的在线二部匹配问题:$G(V_1, V_2, E)$是一个带权的二部图,其中$V_1$是已知的,并且$V_2$的顶点在线到达.目标是在$V_2$的顶点到达$V_1$的顶点时进行匹配,以最大化匹配中边的权重和。如果不能改变对$V_1$的分配,则不能实现有界竞争比。我们研究了加权的在线匹配问题与{ \em自由处置},在$V_1$中的顶点可以被分配多次,但只得到信贷的过程中分配给他们的最大重量边缘的算法。对于这个问题,贪心算法是$0.5$竞争和确定是否有更好的竞争比是一个众所周知的开放问题。我们确定了一个有趣的特殊情况下,边缘的权重是可分解的产品的两个因素,一个对应于每个端点的边缘。这类似于调度文献中研究得很好的相关机器模型,尽管目标函数不同。对于这种情况下,可分解的边权重,我们设计了一个0.5664的竞争随机算法在完全二部图。我们发现,这种情况下,可分解的权重是不平凡的,建立上限为0.618确定性和$0.8$的随机算法。对于0-1情况以及边权重仅取决于离线顶点的情况,$1-1/e \approx 0.632$的紧密竞争比先前是已知的,但是对于这些情况,重新排序不能改变解的质量。在需要重新排序的情况下,为加权匹配击败0.5一直是一个重大挑战。因此,我们给出了第一个在线算法的竞争比严格优于0.5的非平凡的情况下,加权匹配与自由处置。

英文摘要:

We study a weighted online bipartite matching problem: $G(V_1, V_2, E)$ is a weighted bipartite graph where $V_1$ is known beforehand and the vertices of $V_2$ arrive online. The goal is to match vertices of $V_2$ as they arrive to vertices in $V_1$, so as to maximize the sum of weights of edges in the matching. If assignments to $V_1$ cannot be changed, no bounded competitive ratio is achievable. We study the weighted online matching problem with {\em free disposal}, where vertices in $V_1$ can be assigned multiple times, but only get credit for the maximum weight edge assigned to them over the course of the algorithm. For this problem, the greedy algorithm is $0.5$-competitive and determining whether a better competitive ratio is achievable is a well known open problem. We identify an interesting special case where the edge weights are decomposable as the product of two factors, one corresponding to each end point of the edge. This is analogous to the well studied related machines model in the scheduling literature, although the objective functions are different. For this case of decomposable edge weights, we design a 0.5664 competitive randomized algorithm in complete bipartite graphs. We show that such instances with decomposable weights are non-trivial by establishing upper bounds of 0.618 for deterministic and $0.8$ for randomized algorithms. A tight competitive ratio of $1-1/e \approx 0.632$ was known previously for both the 0-1 case as well as the case where edge weights depend on the offline vertices only, but for these cases, reassignments cannot change the quality of the solution. Beating 0.5 for weighted matching where reassignments are necessary has been a significant challenge. We thus give the first online algorithm with competitive ratio strictly better than 0.5 for a non-trivial case of weighted matching with free disposal.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑