arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1301.4253physics.gen-ph
收藏

走向量子和相对论的真正综合：绝对一致性的实验证据

Toward a real synthesis of quantum and relativity theories: experimental evidence for absolute simultaneity

S. A. Emelyanov

备注：
6th International Workshop DICE2012 (Space-Time-Matter), September 17-21, 2012 (Castiglioncello, Italy)
发表信息：
Proc. 6-th Int. Workshop "Spacetime - Matter - Quantum Mechanics" (DICE2012), Castiglioncello, Italy, Sept. 17-21, 2012 (J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 442, 012035 (2013))
阅读 PDF
arXiv 页面 ↗HTML 原文 ↗

摘要：

我们已经证明了电子的空间不连续跳跃，距离约为1厘米。这种效应发生在一个由大量扩展的Laughlin-Halperin型态组成的修正的整数量子Hall系统中。我们的观察结果直接与爱因斯坦对狭义相对论的无以太解释以及闵可夫斯基的时空模型相矛盾。然而，它们与与以太相关的洛伦兹-庞加莱的解释是一致的，该解释允许绝对的不确定性。从而有力地挑战了洛伦兹不变性的根本地位，打破了反对德布罗意-玻姆实在量子理论的基本论点。我们认为，德布罗意-玻姆和洛伦兹-庞加莱理论都能够提供一个真正的综合量子和相对论理论。这种综合是这样的，以至于量子理论似乎是最基本的物理理论，而相对论只是它的一个极限情况。按照这个层次，量子理论自然地解决了洛伦兹-庞加莱相对论中的以太问题。以太可能是一个更深的玻姆型不可分割的量子前空间，其相关性直接来自我们的观察。

英文摘要：

We have demonstrated spatially-discontinuous jumps of electrons at a distance as long as about 1cm. The effect occurs in a modified integer quantum Hall system consisted of a great number of extended Laughlin-Halperin-type states. Our observations directly contradict the no-aether Einstein's interpretation of special relativity together with the Minkowski's model of spacetime. However they are consistent with the aether-related Lorentz-Poincare's interpretation that allows absolute simultaneity. We thus strongly challenge the fundamental status of Lorentz invariance and hence break the basic argument against de Broglie-Bohm realistic quantum theory. We argue that both de Broglie-Bohm and Lorentz-Poincare theories are capable of providing a real synthesis of quantum and relativity theories. The synthesis is of such kind that quantum theory appears the most fundamental physical theory for which relativity is only a limiting case. In accordance with this hierarchy, quantum theory naturally resolves the problem of aether in Lorentz-Poincare's relativity. The aether could be a deeper Bohm-type undivided quantum pre-space, the relevance of which directly follows from our observations.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。

↑