绝对空间中的狭义相对论：从术语矛盾到显而易见
Special Relativity in Absolute Space: from a contradiction in terms to an obviousness
摘要：
这部作品涉及绝对空间和相对论的问题。特别是，提供了另一种推导狭义相对论所描述的效果，这是基于一个描述，假设一个特权参考系。目前的理论遵循洛伦兹和庞加莱的思想，放弃了爱因斯坦对所有惯性系“等价”的严格观点。相对性原理的意义进行了讨论和阐明，它表明，它是不相容的存在一个首选的，绝对的，框架。今天，大多数科学家仍然认为这里提出的理论的基本假设是完全错误的。此外，他们倾向于看到洛伦兹-庞加莱公式和爱因斯坦-闵可夫斯基公式之间不可调和的冲突。然而，正如John Bell [Bell 1988]所指出的，尽管两种观点之间存在严格的“哲学差异”，“物理学的事实并不迫使我们接受一种哲学而不是另一种哲学”。贝尔的断言的有效性是明确的证明，它是如何以及为什么这两种方法确实同意的描述（大部分？）物理现象。显然，不同的物理量-例如“时间”、“速度”、“同步性”和“同步性”-的物理意义在两个方案中是完全不同的。然而，乍看起来可能会令人困惑，目前的理论，在洛仑兹-庞加莱假设的首选参考系下发展，在某种程度上包含了爱因斯坦的理论。没有冲突，因为有一个理论。它强调，现实并不因人们对它的描述而改变，因此它也不因时钟被设定的特定方式而改变。
英文摘要：
This work deals with the questions of absolute space and relativity. In particular, an alternative derivation of the effects described by special relativity is provided, which is based on a description that assumes a privileged reference frame. The present theory follows the ideas of Lorentz and Poincare, abandoning a strict view of Einstein's "equivalence" of all inertial frames. The meaning of the Principle of Relativity is discussed and elucidated, and it is shown that it is not incompatible with the existence of a preferred, absolute, frame. Most scientists nowadays still consider the basic assumptions of the theory proposed here to be plain wrong. Moreover, they tend to see an irreconcilable conflict between the Lorentz-Poincare and the Einstein-Minkowski formulations. However, as stated by John Bell [Bell1988], although there is a stringent "difference in philosophy" between both views, "the facts of physics do not oblige us to accept one philosophy rather than the other". The validity of Bell's assertion is unambiguously demonstrated, and it is shown how and why both approaches do indeed agree in the description of (most of?) the physical phenomena. Evidently, the physical meaning of the different physical quantities - such as "time", "speed", "simultaneity" and "synchronization" - is quite different in both programmes. And yet, for perplexing it may look at first sight, the present theory, developed under the Lorentz-Poincare assumption of a preferred reference frame, somehow encompasses Einstein's theory. There is no conflict, as there is one theory. It is stressed that reality is not changed by the choices one makes to describe it, so it is not changed by the particular way in which the clocks have been set.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
