爱因斯坦-洛伦兹之争再探
The Einstein - Lorentz Dispute Revisited
摘要：
洛仑兹[的洛仑兹变换和洛仑兹收缩的名声]与爱因斯坦争辩说，必须有一个介质，电磁波存在和传播，这将是必然的绝对参照系的宇宙。爱因斯坦赢得了这场争论，他认为电磁波不需要介质，也不存在绝对的参照系。但是，这场胜利是在一个冲突的洛伦兹意见反对爱因斯坦的意见结合了大量的其他成功和声誉或爱因斯坦。这不是一个坚实的推理的胜利，也没有证明事实证据。现在，爱因斯坦和洛伦兹无法获得的可靠推理和新数据表明，洛伦兹是正确的，爱因斯坦的相对论应该被正确地称为爱因斯坦的不变性原理。指出爱因斯坦的综合相对论和对宇宙绝对参照系的否定是不正确的，宇宙存在绝对的普适质参照系。这种修正的意义，在其关系到科学和社会的相互作用，然后提出。
英文摘要：
Lorentz [of the Lorentz transforms and Lorentz contractions fame] contended against Einstein that there had to be a medium in which electro-magnetic waves exist and propagate, and that that would of necessity be an absolute frame of reference for the universe. Einstein won that dispute contending that electro-magnetic waves needed no medium and that there was no absolute frame of reference. But, that victory was in a conflict of the Lorentz opinion opposed to the Einstein opinion combined with the substantial other successes and reputation or Einstein. It was not a victory of solid reasoning nor demonstrated factual evidence. Now solid reasoning and new data not available to Einstein and Lorentz show that Lorentz was correct and that Einstein's Theory of Relativity should correctly be termed Einstein's Principle of Invariance. It is shown that Einstein's comprehensive relativity and denial of an absolute frame of reference for the universe are incorrect and that the universe has an absolute universal prime frame of reference. The significance of this correction in its relation to the interaction of science and society is then presented.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
