arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv physics/0612041physics.gen-ph
收藏

时空物理学II:对爱因斯坦1905年狭义相对论论文的重新评价

The physics of space and time II: A reassessment of Einstein's 1905 special relativity paper

J. H. Field

摘要:

详细重新审查的开创性文件狭义相对论,考虑到最近的工作的物理解释的时空洛伦兹变换以及现代理解的经典电磁学的某种限制的基本理论-量子电动力学-提出。许多错误的物理原理和数学性质的发现。文中所预言的“同时性的相对性”和“长度收缩”效应分别是对第二公设和洛伦兹变换的错误解释的虚假结果。后者的推导中的文件被证明是有缺陷的。在这种情况下,以及其他情况下,由于错误的抵消,以错误的方式获得了正确的结果。分别列出正确和不正确的预测的文件。由于其认识论方法的独特性和革命性(使用“思想实验”和公理推导)以及实验验证的时间膨胀和质能等效性的预测,这篇论文对物理学发展的根本重要性几乎不受它所包含的许多数学错误和(对现代人来说)物理误解的影响。

英文摘要:

A detailed re-examination of the seminal paper on special relativity, taking into account recent work on the physical interpretation of the space-time Lorentz transformation as well as the modern understanding of classical elecromagnetism as a certain limit of the fundamental underlying theory --quantum electrodynamics-- is presented. Many errors both of physical principle and of a mathematical nature are uncovered. The `relativity of simultaneity' and `length contraction' effects predicted in the paper are shown to be the spurious consequences of misinterpretations of the second postulate and the Lorentz transformation, respectively. The derivation of the latter in the paper is shown to be flawed. In this case, and other instances, due to cancellation of mistakes, a correct result is obtained in a fallacious manner. Separate lists of the correct and incorrect predictions of the paper are given. Due to the unique and revolutionary nature of its epistemological approach (the use of `thought experiments' and axiomatic derivations) and the experimentally verified predictions of time-dilatation and mass-energy equivalence the fundamental importance of the paper for the development of physics is little affected by the many mathematical errors and (to modern eyes) physical misconceptions that it contains.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑