arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 1111.7298cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.space-ph
收藏

使用技术上完整的Fowler-Nordheim型方程提取大面积场致发射体的发射参数

Extraction of emission parameters for large-area field emitters, using a technically complete Fowler-Nordheim-type equation

Richard G. Forbes

摘要:

在大面积场致发射体(LAFE)冷场电子发射的研究中,普遍存在着一种错误的Fowler-Nordheim型(FN型)方程。该方程通过一个大的高度可变的因子过度预测了LAFE平均电流密度,该因子通常被认为在1000和1000 000 000之间。这个方程,虽然经常被引用到FN的1928年的论文,是一个简化的方程用于本科教学,不适用于未经修改的LAFE,并没有出现在1928年的文件。技术LAFE论文通常不引用任何比1928年更近的理论工作,并且通常不评论理论与实验之间的差异。这种用法在美国和英国的几个知名应用科学期刊以及其他许多地方都有广泛的应用。它不会抑制实际的LAFE开发,但会给非专家潜在的LAFE性能造成误导性印象。本文展示了如何误导方程可以取代一个概念上完整的FN型方程,使用三个高层次的校正因子。其中之一,或其中两个的组合,可能是有用的LAFE质量的一个额外的措施,本文介绍了如何估计因子值使用实验数据。提出了改进的工程实践中报告LAFE结果的建议。其中一些应有助于防止出现这样的情况,即出现在高知名度的应用科学期刊上的方程被用来支持工程监管机构可能认为涉及专业疏忽的声明。

英文摘要:

In papers on cold field electron emission from large area field emitters (LAFEs), it has become widespread practice to publish a misleading Fowler-Nordheim-type (FN-type) equation. This equation over-predicts the LAFE-average current density by a large highly-variable factor thought to usually lie between 1000 and 1000 000 000. This equation, although often referenced to FN's 1928 paper, is a simplified equation used in undergraduate teaching, does not apply unmodified to LAFEs, and does not appear in the 1928 paper. Technological LAFE papers often do not cite any theoretical work more recent than 1928, and often do not comment on the discrepancy between theory and experiment. This usage has occurred widely, in several high-profile American and UK applied-science journals, and in various other places. It does not inhibit practical LAFE development, but can give a misleading impression of potential LAFE performance to non-experts. This paper shows how the misleading equation can be replaced by a conceptually complete FN-type equation that uses three high-level correction factors. One of these, or a combination of two of them, may be useful as an additional measure of LAFE quality; this paper describes how to estimate factor values using experimental data. Suggestions are made for improved engineering practice in reporting LAFE results. Some of these should help to prevent situations arising whereby an equation appearing in high-profile applied-science journals is used to support statements that an engineering regulatory body might deem to involve professional negligence.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑