对“用于现代冷阴极材料研究的先进场致发射测量技术及其在透射型X射线源中的应用”的评论[Rev. Sci.仪器91，083906（2020）]
Comment on "Advanced field emission measurement techniques for research on modern cold cathode materials and their applications for transmission-type x-ray sources" [Rev. Sci. Instrum. 91, 083906 (2020)]
摘要：
本评论建议，技术领域的电子发射（FE）论文，如正在讨论的论文[P.Serbun等人，Rev. Sci.仪器91，083906（2020）]，应该使用基于Murphy和Good（MG）1956年工作的FE理论，而不是基于Fowler和Nordheim（FN）1928年原始工作的FE理论的简化版本。使用1928年的理论是技术FE文献中的常见做法，但MG处理被认为是更好的物理比FN处理，其中包含可识别的错误。MG处理预测发射体的发射电流密度和电流比FN处理显着更高。从电子源的研究和开发的观点来看，FE技术文献使用低估场致电子发射器性能的理论是适得其反的（对非专家没有帮助）。
英文摘要：
This Comment suggests that technological field electron emission (FE) papers, such as the paper under discussion [P. Serbun et al.,, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 91, 083906 (2020)], should use FE theory based on the 1956 work of Murphy and Good (MG), rather than a simplified version of FE theory based on the original 1928 work of Fowler and Nordheim (FN). Use of the 1928 theory is common practice in technological FE literature, but the MG treatment is known to be better physics than the FN treatment, which contains identifiable errors. The MG treatment predicts significantly higher emission current densities and currents for emitters than does the FN treatment. From the viewpoint of the research and development of electron sources, it is counterproductive (and unhelpful for non-experts) for the technological FE literature to use theory that undervalues the performance of field electron emitters.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
