arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 1105.2071q-bio.PE
收藏

复杂生态系统的稳定性判据

Stability Criteria for Complex Ecosystems

Stefano Allesina, Si Tang

摘要:

40年前,罗伯特·梅(Robert May)通过证明足够大或足够复杂的生态网络持续存在的概率接近于零,对生态学的一个核心信念提出了质疑。为了证明这一点,他分析了物种随机互动的大型网络。然而,在自然系统中,物种对具有明确定义的相互作用(例如,捕食者-猎物、互惠或竞争)。在这里,我们扩展五月的结果,这些关系,并发现显着的差异捕食者-猎物的相互作用,增加稳定性,互利和竞争,这是不稳定的。我们提供了所有情况下的分析稳定性准则。这些结果在生态学中具有广泛的适用性。例如,我们发现,令人惊讶的是,当我们施加现实食物网〈动〉<动>结构或我们引入一个大的优势弱相互作用的捕食者-猎物网络的稳定性的概率降低。同样,稳定性也会受到双向互惠网络嵌套的负面影响。

英文摘要:

Forty years ago, Robert May questioned a central belief in ecology by proving that sufficiently large or complex ecological networks have probability of persisting close to zero. To prove this point, he analyzed large networks in which species interact at random. However, in natural systems pairs of species have well-defined interactions (e.g., predator-prey, mutualistic or competitive). Here we extend May's results to these relationships and find remarkable differences between predator-prey interactions, which increase stability, and mutualistic and competitive, which are destabilizing. We provide analytic stability criteria for all cases. These results have broad applicability in ecology. For example, we show that, surprisingly, the probability of stability for predator-prey networks is decreased when we impose realistic food web structure or we introduce a large preponderance of weak interactions. Similarly, stability is negatively impacted by nestedness in bipartite mutualistic networks.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑