arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 0901.2509astro-ph.SR
收藏

太阳双星HIP 56948、HIP 79672和HIP 100963的高色散光谱研究

High-Dispersion Spectroscopic Study of Solar Twins: HIP 56948, HIP 79672, and HIP 100963

Yoichi Takeda, Akito Tajitsu

摘要:

对三个具有代表性的太阳双胞胎进行了深入的光谱研究(HIP 56948、HIP 79672和HIP 100963)以及太阳(月亮;参考标准),目的是(1)根据精确建立的微分参数定量讨论相对于太阳的相似性,以及(2)探讨了造成李丰度差异的原因。结果表明,HIP 56948在各个方面都与太阳最为相似,包括三个太阳中的锂丰度(尽管不是完全相似),因此被称为“有史以来最接近的太阳孪生兄弟”,而HIP 79672和HIP 100963的有效温度略高,表面锂成分也略高。虽然有迹象表明Li是旋转相关的,因为HIP 56948(和太阳)的预计旋转略低于其他两个,旋转差异似乎并不那么大,以有效地产生Li的显着变化。相反,这可能更有可能归因于(至少部分地)经由一些T_eff敏感的Li控制机制的T_eff的轻微差异。由于铍的丰度被发现基本上是所有恒星的太阳,而不考虑Li,任何导致Li多样性的物理过程都应该只对Li起作用,而不会影响Be。

英文摘要:

An intensive spectroscopic study was performed for three representative solar twins (HIP 56948, HIP 79672, and HIP 100963) as well as for the Sun (Moon; reference standard), with an intention of (1) quantitatively discussing the relative-to-Sun similarities based on the precisely established differential parameters and (2) investigating the reason causing the Li abundance differences despite their similarities. It was concluded that HIP 56948 most resembles the Sun in every respect including the Li abundance (though not perfectly similar) among the three and deserves the name of "closest-ever solar twin", while HIP 79672 and HIP 100963 have somewhat higher effective temperature and appreciably higher surface Li composition. While there is an indication of Li being rotation-dependent because the projected rotation in HIP 56948 (and the Sun) is slightly lower than the other two, the rotational difference alone does not seem to be so large as to efficiently produce the marked change in Li. Rather, this may be more likely to be attributed (at least partly) to the slight difference in T_eff via some T_eff-sensitive Li-controlling mechanism. Since the abundance of beryllium was found to be essentially solar for all stars irrespective of Li, any physical process causing the Li diversity should work only on Li without affecting Be.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑