arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 0802.1008stat.MEmath.STstat.TH
收藏

高斯过程元模型Sobol指标的计算

Calculations of Sobol indices for the Gaussian process metamodel

Amandine Marrel, Bertrand Iooss, Beatrice Laurent, Olivier Roustant

摘要:

复杂数值模型的全局敏感性分析可以通过计算输入变量的基于方差的重要性度量(例如Sobol指数)来执行。然而,这些技术,需要大量的模型评估,往往是不可接受的时间昂贵的计算机代码。一个众所周知的和广泛使用的决定包括用元模型代替计算机代码,预测模型响应与一个可以忽略不计的计算时间和渲染简单的估计Sobol指数。本文讨论了高斯过程模型,给出了Sobol指数的解析表达式。研究了两种计算Sobol指数的方法:第一种基于高斯过程模型的预测器,第二种基于全局随机过程模型。两种估计之间的比较,分析的例子,显示了第二种方法的收敛性和鲁棒性方面的优越性。此外,第二种方法允许集成的高斯过程模型的建模误差,直接给出一些置信区间的Sobol指数。最后将这些技术应用于一个水文地质建模实例。

英文摘要:

Global sensitivity analysis of complex numerical models can be performed by calculating variance-based importance measures of the input variables, such as the Sobol indices. However, these techniques, requiring a large number of model evaluations, are often unacceptable for time expensive computer codes. A well known and widely used decision consists in replacing the computer code by a metamodel, predicting the model responses with a negligible computation time and rending straightforward the estimation of Sobol indices. In this paper, we discuss about the Gaussian process model which gives analytical expressions of Sobol indices. Two approaches are studied to compute the Sobol indices: the first based on the predictor of the Gaussian process model and the second based on the global stochastic process model. Comparisons between the two estimates, made on analytical examples, show the superiority of the second approach in terms of convergence and robustness. Moreover, the second approach allows to integrate the modeling error of the Gaussian process model by directly giving some confidence intervals on the Sobol indices. These techniques are finally applied to a real case of hydrogeological modeling.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑