arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 0709.3909quant-ph
收藏

贝尔不等式:物理学遇到概率

Bell's inequality: Physics meets Probability

Andrei Khrennikov

摘要:

我们提醒这样一种观点,即贝尔不等式的违反不仅可以被解释为另一种选择的证据--非定域性或“实在的死亡”(假设量子力学是不完整的)。违反贝尔型不等式是一个众所周知的充分条件不相容的随机变量-不可能实现他们在一个单一的概率空间。因此,事实上,我们应该考虑违反贝尔不等式的另一种解释--EPR-玻姆实验中涉及的几对随机变量(二维向量变量)是不相容的。它们不能在单个柯尔莫哥洛夫概率空间上实现。因此,人们可以在以下两种情况中做出选择:a)量子力学的完备性; b)非定域性; c)"实在的死亡“; d)非柯尔莫哥洛夫性。在任何情况下,违背贝尔不等式有各种可能的解释。因此,它不能用来推导量子模型与经典模型之间关系的唯一结论。

英文摘要:

We remind the viewpoint that violation of Bell's inequality might be interpreted not only as an evidence of the alternative -- either nonlocality or ``death of reality'' (under the assumption the quantum mechanics is incomplete). Violation of Bell's type inequalities is a well known sufficient condition of incompatibility of random variables -- impossibility to realize them on a single probability space. Thus, in fact, we should take into account an additional interpretation of violation of Bell's inequality -- a few pairs of random variables (two dimensional vector variables) involved in the EPR-Bohm experiment are incompatible. They could not be realized on a single Kolmogorov probability space. Thus one can choose between: a) completeness of quantum mechanics; b) nonlocality; c) `` death of reality''; d) non-Kolmogorovness. In any event, violation of Bell's inequality has a variety of possible interpretations. Hence, it could not be used to derive the unique conclusion on the relation between quantum and classical models.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑