The probabilistic predictions of quantum theory are conventionally obtained from a special probabilistic axiom. But that is unnecessary because all the practical consequences of such predictions follow from the remaining, non-probabilistic, axioms of quantum theory, together with the non-probabilistic part of classical decision theory.
We present an experimental illustration on the quantum sensitivity of decision making machinery. In the decision making process, we consider the role of available information, say hint, whether it influences the optimal choices. To the end, we consider a machinery method of decision making in a probabilistic way. Our main result shows that in decision making process our quantum machine is more highly sensitive than its classical counterpart to the hints we categorize into "good" and "poor." This quantum feature originates from the quantum superposition involved in the decision making process. …
In this paper it is proposed the dynamical quantum Zeno Effect in quantum decision theory. The measurement postulate is not an essential ingredient for the explanation of the quantum Zeno effect, a dynamical account is given in quantum physics. In this account, the entanglement between the system of interest and the apparatus inhibit the quantum transition. The collapse postulate is not considered. It is show in this paper that the belief-action entanglement model provides a mathematical framework for the dynamical quantum Zeno effect in quantum decision theory. It is also shown that, in this …
We propose a quantum expected value theory for decision-making under uncertainty. Quantum density operator as value operator is proposed to simulate people's subjective beliefs. Value operator guides people to choose corresponding actions based on their subjective beliefs through objective world. The value operator can be constructed from quantum gates and logic operations as a quantum decision tree. The genetic programming is used to optimize and auto-generate quantum decision trees.
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research（联合核研究所）；Universidade de São Paulo（圣保罗大学）
An approach is presented treating decision theory as a probabilistic theory based on quantum techniques. Accurate definitions are given and thorough analysis is accomplished for the quantum probabilities describing the choice between separate alternatives, sequential alternatives characterizing conditional quantum probabilities, and behavioral quantum probabilities taking into account rational-irrational duality of decision making. The comparison between quantum and classical probabilities is explained. The analysis demonstrates that quantum probabilities serve as an essentially more powerful …
This work is related to the implementation of a decision tree construction algorithm on a quantum simulator. Here we consider an algorithm based on a binary criterion. Also, we study the improvement capability with quantum heuristic QAOA. We implemented the classical and the quantum version of this algorithm to compare built trees.
This study utilises an experiment famous in quantum physics, the Stern-Gerlach experiment, to inform the structure of an experimental protocol from which a quantum cognitive decision model can be developed. The 'quantumness' of this model is tested by computing a discrete quasi-probabilistic Wigner function. Based on theory from quantum physics, our hypothesis is that the Stern-Gerlach protocol will admit negative values in the Wigner function, thus signalling that the cognitive decision model is quantum. A crowdsourced experiment of two images was used to collect decisions around three questi…
Due to the rapid development of quantum computing, the compact representation of quantum operations based on decision diagrams has been received more and more attraction. Since variable orders have a significant impact on the size of the decision diagram, identifying a good variable order is of paramount importance. In this paper, we integrate linear transformations into an efficient and canonical form of quantum computing: Quantum Multiple-Valued Decision Diagrams (QMDDs) and develop a novel canonical representation, namely linearly transformed QMDDs (LTQMDDs). We design a linear sifting algo…
Quantum Decision Theory, advanced earlier by the authors, and illustrated for lotteries with gains, is generalized to the games containing lotteries with gains as well as losses. The mathematical structure of the approach is based on the theory of quantum measurements, which makes this approach relevant both for the description of decision making of humans and the creation of artificial quantum intelligence. General rules are formulated allowing for the explicit calculation of quantum probabilities representing the fraction of decision makers preferring the considered prospects. This provides …
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research（联合核研究所）；ETH Zürich, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology（苏黎世联邦理工学院）
The review presents the basics of quantum decision theory, with the emphasis on temporary processes in decision making. The aim is to explain the principal points of the theory. The difference of an operationally testable rational choice between alternatives from a choice decorated by irrational feelings is elucidated. Quantum-classical correspondence is emphasized. A model of quantum intelligence network is described. Dynamic inconsistencies are shown to be resolved in the frame of the quantum decision theory.
Despite the impressive success of quantum structures to model long-standing human judgement and decision puzzles, the {\it quantum cognition research programme} still faces challenges about its explanatory power. Indeed, quantum models introduce new parameters, which may fit empirical data without necessarily explaining them. Also, one wonders whether more general non-classical structures are better equipped to model cognitive phenomena. In this paper, we provide a {\it realistic-operational foundation of decision processes} using a known decision-making puzzle, the {\it Ellsberg paradox}, as …
{\it Ellsberg thought experiments} and empirical confirmation of Ellsberg preferences pose serious challenges to {\it subjective expected utility theory} (SEUT). We have recently elaborated a quantum-theoretic framework for human decisions under uncertainty which satisfactorily copes with the Ellsberg paradox and other puzzles of SEUT. We apply here the quantum-theoretic framework to the {\it Ellsberg two-urn example}, showing that the paradox can be explained by assuming a state change of the conceptual entity that is the object of the decision ({\it decision-making}, or {\it DM}, {\it entity…
